Karl Matthias, Wichmann Manfred G, Heckmann Siegfried M, Krafft Tim
Department of Prosthodontics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):648-52.
Passive fit is difficult to achieve in implant-supported restorations with existing superstructure fabrication techniques. The aim of the study presented was to investigate whether computer-generated fixed partial dentures (FPDs) based on optical impressions lead to less strain development than conventionally fabricated FPDs.
A measurement model with 2 implants was set up and strain gauges were attached to the model material mesially and distally adjacent to the implants. Two groups of conventional cementable restorations based on repositioning and pick-up impressions, respectively, and 1 group of CAD/CAM-generated FPDs based on optical impressions were fabricated (n = 10). Strain development during FPD fixation was recorded. In order to compare the different FPD groups with one another, a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was performed at a level of significance of alpha = .05.
The mean strain development at the different strain gauge locations ranged from 80.38 microm/m to 437.11 microm/m. The 2 groups of conventionally fabricated FPDs showed no significant difference in terms of strain development (P = .07). The CAD/CAM-fabricated FPDs revealed a significantly lower strain development than those made from pick-up technique impressions (P = .01). No significant difference could be detected between the FPDs manufactured from repositioning technique impressions and the CAD/CAM-generated restorations (P = .19).
Within the limitations of the study presented, it can be concluded that restorations fabricated on the basis of optical impressions demonstrate a level of fit which is at least as passive as that of conventional FPDs.
采用现有的上部结构制作技术,在种植体支持的修复体中难以实现被动就位。本研究的目的是调查基于光学印模的计算机生成的固定局部义齿(FPD)是否比传统制作的FPD产生的应变更小。
建立一个带有2颗种植体的测量模型,并在与种植体相邻的模型材料的近中和远中附着应变片。分别制作两组基于重新定位印模和取模印模的传统可粘结修复体,以及一组基于光学印模的CAD/CAM生成的FPD(n = 10)。记录FPD固定过程中的应变发展情况。为了比较不同的FPD组,在显著性水平α = 0.05下进行多变量方差分析(MANOVA)。
不同应变片位置的平均应变发展范围为80.38微米/米至437.11微米/米。两组传统制作的FPD在应变发展方面没有显著差异(P = 0.07)。CAD/CAM制作的FPD显示出比取模技术印模制作的FPD显著更低的应变发展(P = 0.01)。在重新定位技术印模制作的FPD和CAD/CAM生成的修复体之间未检测到显著差异(P = 0.19)。
在本研究的局限性范围内,可以得出结论,基于光学印模制作的修复体显示出至少与传统FPD一样被动的就位水平。