• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布比卡因与利多卡因用于上颌浸润麻醉的前瞻性、随机、双盲对照研究。

A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.

作者信息

Gross Renie, McCartney Melissa, Reader Al, Beck Mike

机构信息

Section of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, Ohio State University, 305 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

出版信息

J Endod. 2007 Sep;33(9):1021-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.003
PMID:17931925
Abstract

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in maxillary lateral incisors and first molars. Sixty-five subjects randomly received, in a double-blind manner, two infiltrations at two separate appointments, in a crossover design. The injections consisted of maxillary lateral incisor and first molar infiltrations of 1.8 mL 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 1.8 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. In maxillary lateral incisors, bupivacaine exhibited a significantly lower anesthetic success rate (obtaining two consecutive 80 readings with the pulp tester within 10 minutes) of 78% when compared with a 97% success rate with lidocaine. In maxillary first molars, bupivacaine's onset of pulpal anesthesia (7.7 minutes) was significantly slower than lidocaine (4.3 minutes). Bupivacaine had a lower success rate than lidocaine (64% versus 82%) but there was no significant difference between the two solutions. Neither solution provided pulpal anesthesia for 1 hour.

摘要

这项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究的目的是评估1.8毫升含1:200,000肾上腺素的0.5%布比卡因和1.8毫升含1:100,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因在上颌侧切牙和第一磨牙的麻醉效果。65名受试者以双盲方式在两次单独的就诊中随机接受两种浸润麻醉,采用交叉设计。注射药物包括上颌侧切牙和第一磨牙浸润麻醉,分别注射1.8毫升含1:200,000肾上腺素的0.5%布比卡因和1.8毫升含1:100,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因。在上颌侧切牙中,与利多卡因97%的成功率相比,布比卡因的麻醉成功率(在10分钟内用牙髓活力测试仪连续两次读数达到80)显著较低,为78%。在上颌第一磨牙中,布比卡因的牙髓麻醉起效时间(7.7分钟)明显慢于利多卡因(4.3分钟)。布比卡因的成功率低于利多卡因(64%对82%),但两种溶液之间无显著差异。两种溶液均未提供1小时的牙髓麻醉。

相似文献

1
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.布比卡因与利多卡因用于上颌浸润麻醉的前瞻性、随机、双盲对照研究。
J Endod. 2007 Sep;33(9):1021-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.003.
2
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.阿替卡因与利多卡因用于上颌浸润麻醉的前瞻性、随机、双盲对照研究。
J Endod. 2008 Apr;34(4):389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
3
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 epinephrine and 3% mepivacaine for maxillary infiltrations.2%利多卡因分别与1:100,000和1:50,000肾上腺素以及3%甲哌卡因用于上颌浸润麻醉的前瞻性、随机、双盲对照研究。
J Endod. 2009 Sep;35(9):1173-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.06.016.
4
Anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for maxillary infiltrations.1.8毫升和3.6毫升含1:100,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因用于上颌浸润麻醉的效果
J Endod. 2008 Feb;34(2):121-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.001.
5
Anesthetic efficacy of ropivacaine in maxillary anterior infiltration.罗哌卡因在上颌前部浸润麻醉中的效果
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Apr;91(4):406-12. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.114000.
6
Anesthetic efficacy of infiltrations in mandibular anterior teeth.下颌前牙浸润麻醉的效果
Anesth Prog. 2001 Spring;48(2):55-60.
7
Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.使用计算机控制局部麻醉药输送系统进行初次韧带内注射时阿替卡因和利多卡因的疗效。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Mar;99(3):361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.11.009.
8
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4% prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 4% prilocaine for maxillary infiltrations.2%利多卡因与1:100,000肾上腺素、4%丙胺卡因与1:200,000肾上腺素以及4%丙胺卡因用于上颌浸润麻醉的前瞻性、随机、双盲比较。
Anesth Prog. 2010 Summer;57(2):45-51. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-57.2.45.
9
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of two percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 epinephrine and three percent mepivacaine in the intraoral, infraorbital nerve block.一项关于 2%利多卡因分别与 1:100000 和 1:50000 肾上腺素以及 3%甲哌卡因在口腔内、眶下神经阻滞中的麻醉效果的前瞻性、随机、双盲比较。
J Endod. 2009 Nov;35(11):1498-504. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.08.007. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
10
Anesthetic efficacy of articaine for combination labial plus lingual infiltrations versus labial infiltration in the mandibular lateral incisor.盐酸阿替卡因用于下颌侧切牙唇颊侧及舌侧浸润麻醉与唇侧浸润麻醉的麻醉效果比较。
J Endod. 2010 Jun;36(6):952-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Premedication and Dental Anxiety on Anesthetic Efficacy in Patients Undergoing Root Canal for Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis in Upper and Lower Molars: A Comparative Study of Articaine and Bupivacaine.术前用药和牙科焦虑对上下颌磨牙有症状不可逆性牙髓炎患者根管治疗麻醉效果的影响:阿替卡因与布比卡因的对比研究
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Apr 30;13(5):199. doi: 10.3390/dj13050199.
2
Comparison of the effects of lidocaine and articaine used for buccal infiltration and supplemental palatinal infiltration anesthesia in maxillary molars with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized study.利多卡因与阿替卡因用于上颌磨牙不可逆性牙髓炎颊侧浸润及补充腭侧浸润麻醉效果的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 8;25(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05552-y.
3
Buccal versus buccal palatal infiltration for pulpal anesthesia using 2% lidocaine and 4% articaine: A randomized controlled trial.使用2%利多卡因和4%阿替卡因进行颊侧与颊腭侧浸润麻醉用于牙髓麻醉的随机对照试验。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Mar-Apr;14(2):205-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.02.004. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
4
Success of Pulpal Anesthesia Following Buccal Infiltration of the Maxillary First Molar With 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of 4% Articaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine: A Prospective, Randomized Crossover Study.上颌第一磨牙颊侧浸润注射 1.8 毫升和 3.6 毫升 4%阿替卡因含 1:100000 肾上腺素后牙髓麻醉效果的前瞻性随机交叉研究。
Anesth Prog. 2023 Sep 1;70(3):110-115. doi: 10.2344/anpr-70-03-01.
5
Pulpal anesthesia of maxillary first molars using 4% articaine infiltration in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial.在有症状的不可逆性牙髓炎患者中使用4%阿替卡因浸润进行上颌第一磨牙牙髓麻醉:一项随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jul;27(7):3999-4006. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05025-y. Epub 2023 May 27.
6
Local Anesthetic Efficacy in Marijuana Users and Nonusers: A Pilot Study.大麻使用者和非使用者的局部麻醉效果:一项初步研究。
Anesth Prog. 2022 Dec 1;69(4):15-21. doi: 10.2344/anpr-69-02-08.
7
Anesthetic efficacies of buccal with palatal injection versus buccal with intra-septal injection in permanent maxillary first molars of pediatric patients.在小儿患者的恒牙上颌第一磨牙中,颊侧联合腭侧注射与颊侧联合鼻中隔注射的麻醉效果比较。
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Aug;22(4):239-254. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.4.239. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
8
Comparative Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine and 2% Lidocaine for Buccal Infiltration in Adult Patients with Irreversible Pulpitis of Maxillary First Molar: A Prospective Randomized Study.4%阿替卡因与2%利多卡因用于上颌第一磨牙不可逆性牙髓炎成年患者颊侧浸润麻醉效果的比较评价:一项前瞻性随机研究
Contemp Clin Dent. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):61-68. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_710_20. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
9
Anesthetic efficacy in vital asymptomatic teeth using different local anesthetics: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.使用不同局部麻醉剂对无症状活髓牙的麻醉效果:一项网络Meta分析的系统评价
Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Jul 21;46(3):e41. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e41. eCollection 2021 Aug.
10
Determination of Anesthetic Efficacy of Lidocaine Versus Bupivacaine in Single Visit Root Canal Treatment.测定单次根管治疗中利多卡因与布比卡因的麻醉效果。
Eur Endod J. 2020 Jun 11;5(2):68-72. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.88597. eCollection 2020.