Suppr超能文献

(反)硝化中间产物与H2O之间的氧交换及其对NO3-和N2O来源确定的影响:综述

Oxygen exchange between (de)nitrification intermediates and H2O and its implications for source determination of NO3- and N2O: a review.

作者信息

Kool D M, Wrage N, Oenema O, Dolfing J, Van Groenigen J W

机构信息

Alterra, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2007;21(22):3569-78. doi: 10.1002/rcm.3249.

Abstract

Stable isotope analysis of oxygen (O) is increasingly used to determine the origin of nitrate (NO(3)-) and nitrous oxide (N(2)O) in the environment. The assumption underlying these studies is that the (18)O signature of NO(3)- and N(2)O provides information on the different O sources (O(2) and H(2)O) during the production of these compounds by various biochemical pathways. However, exchange of O atoms between H(2)O and intermediates of the (de)nitrification pathways may change the isotopic signal and thereby bias its interpretation for source determination. Chemical exchange of O between H(2)O and various nitrogenous oxides has been reported, but the probability and extent of its occurrence in terrestrial ecosystems remain unclear. Biochemical O exchange between H(2)O and nitrogenous oxides, NO(2)- in particular, has been reported for monocultures of many nitrifiers and denitrifiers that are abundant in nature, with exchange rates of up to 100%. Therefore, biochemical O exchange is likely to be important in most soil ecosystems, and should be taken into account in source determination studies. Failing to do so might lead to (i) an overestimation of nitrification as NO(3)- source, and (ii) an overestimation of nitrifier denitrification and nitrification-coupled denitrification as N(2)O production pathways. A method to quantify the rate and controls of biochemical O exchange in ecosystems is needed, and we argue this can only be done reliably with artificially enriched (18)O compounds. We conclude that in N source determination studies, the O isotopic signature of especially N(2)O should only be used with extreme caution.

摘要

氧(O)的稳定同位素分析越来越多地用于确定环境中硝酸盐(NO₃⁻)和一氧化二氮(N₂O)的来源。这些研究的基本假设是,NO₃⁻和N₂O的¹⁸O特征提供了有关这些化合物通过各种生化途径产生过程中不同氧源(O₂和H₂O)的信息。然而,H₂O与(反)硝化途径中间体之间的氧原子交换可能会改变同位素信号,从而影响其对来源确定的解释。已有报道H₂O与各种氮氧化物之间存在氧的化学交换,但在陆地生态系统中其发生的概率和程度仍不清楚。对于自然界中大量存在的许多硝化菌和反硝化菌的单一培养物,已有报道H₂O与氮氧化物(特别是NO₂⁻)之间存在生化氧交换,交换率高达100%。因此,生化氧交换在大多数土壤生态系统中可能很重要,在来源确定研究中应予以考虑。否则可能会导致:(i)高估作为NO₃⁻来源的硝化作用;(ii)高估作为N₂O产生途径的硝化菌反硝化作用和硝化耦合反硝化作用。需要一种量化生态系统中生化氧交换速率和控制因素的方法,我们认为只有使用人工富集的¹⁸O化合物才能可靠地做到这一点。我们得出结论,在氮源确定研究中,特别是N₂O的氧同位素特征应极其谨慎地使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验