Tegelberg A, Wenneberg B, List T
Department of Stomatognathic Physiology , Centre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University Central Hospital, Västerås, Sweden.
Eur J Dent Educ. 2007 Nov;11(4):216-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2007.00458.x.
The aim of the study was to map general practice dentists' (GPDs) knowledge of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in children and adolescents.
A questionnaire was mailed to 286 Swedish dentists in the Public Dental Service and 17 TMD specialists with documented research experience. The questionnaire contained 37 statements on aetiology, diagnostics, classification, chronic pain and pain behaviour, treatment, and prognosis. Each statement was judged on a 0-10 point scale with the endpoint definitions agree or disagree.
The overall response rate to the questionnaire was 87%. In 28 of all 37 statements, the TMD specialists endorsed a consensus, i.e. >75% of the specialists had the same opinion about the statement. TMD specialists differed most in opinion in the domain diagnostics and classification. In 65% of the statements, differences in knowledge between GPDs and TMD specialists were non-significant. The greatest number of significant between-group differences was found in the domain treatment and prognosis. Most of these statements were related to morphological factors.
There is a high degree of consensus in TMD knowledge amongst the TMD specialists and a high degree of agreement in knowledge between GPDs and TMD specialists. In some areas, however, TMD specialists still need to reach a consensus which is founded on evidence-based TMD knowledge in children and adolescents and that can be used in undergraduate teaching. It is therefore important to develop and strengthen the undergraduate dental teaching in TMD and orofacial pain.
本研究旨在了解全科牙医(GPDs)对儿童和青少年颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)的认知情况。
向瑞典公共牙科服务机构的286名牙医以及17名有文献记载研究经验的TMD专家邮寄了一份问卷。问卷包含37条关于病因、诊断、分类、慢性疼痛和疼痛行为、治疗及预后的陈述。每条陈述根据0至10分的量表进行判断,端点定义为同意或不同意。
问卷的总体回复率为87%。在所有37条陈述中的28条,TMD专家达成了共识,即超过75%的专家对该陈述有相同看法。TMD专家在诊断和分类领域的意见分歧最大。在65%的陈述中,GPDs和TMD专家之间的知识差异不显著。在治疗和预后领域发现的组间显著差异数量最多。这些陈述大多与形态学因素有关。
TMD专家之间在TMD知识方面有高度共识,GPDs和TMD专家在知识方面也有高度一致性。然而,在某些领域,TMD专家仍需达成基于儿童和青少年TMD循证知识且可用于本科教学的共识。因此,开展并加强本科牙科教育中TMD和口面部疼痛方面的教学很重要。