Klur Tobias, Portegys Sara, Graf Isabelle, Scharf Sven, Braumann Bert, Kruse Teresa
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany.
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;13(4):167. doi: 10.3390/dj13040167.
: To evaluate the role of temporomandibular disorder (TMD)-related diagnostics in orthodontic treatment routines and investigate what consequences are drawn from symptoms concerning orthodontic treatment planning and therapy. : All officially listed orthodontists in Germany were surveyed about their professional background, TMD-related specialization, and concrete clinical procedures. Anonymized responses were systematized, manually checked, and statistically analyzed. Differences in reported TMD-related procedures depending on orthodontists' professional experience and specialization were determined using Fisher's exact tests. : A total of 2359 questionnaires were sent out, of which 630 could be evaluated. The majority of the orthodontists surveyed stated that they perform either a brief TMD screening or a complete functional analysis. In total, 21.1% of the respondents base their examination on the patient's medical history. A second complete functional analysis is performed by 33% of the responding orthodontists during the course of orthodontic therapy, and by 56.6% only in the case of an initial pathological finding. For 60.1% of the respondents, pre-therapeutically diagnosed, non-painful temporomandibular joint clicking has an influence on orthodontic treatment planning. Only 4.3% of respondents take no further action prior to orthodontic therapy in the case of TMD symptoms. There is an indication that professional experience has no influence on the procedure, whereas a specialization in the field of TMDs does. : A discrepancy between the current state of research and standard procedures in German orthodontic practices may lead to an overly detailed examination. However, this has no health disadvantages for the patient.
评估颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)相关诊断在正畸治疗常规中的作用,并调查有关正畸治疗计划和治疗的症状会产生哪些后果。
对德国所有官方登记在册的正畸医生进行了调查,了解他们的专业背景、TMD相关专业以及具体的临床程序。对匿名回复进行了系统化整理、人工检查和统计分析。使用Fisher精确检验确定了根据正畸医生的专业经验和专业不同而报告的TMD相关程序的差异。
共发放了2359份问卷,其中630份可以进行评估。接受调查的大多数正畸医生表示,他们会进行简短的TMD筛查或完整的功能分析。总共有21.1%的受访者根据患者的病史进行检查。33%的受访正畸医生在正畸治疗过程中会进行第二次完整的功能分析,56.6%的医生仅在最初发现病理情况时进行。对于60.1%的受访者来说,治疗前诊断出的无痛性颞下颌关节弹响会影响正畸治疗计划。在出现TMD症状的情况下,只有4.3%的受访者在正畸治疗前不采取进一步措施。有迹象表明,专业经验对程序没有影响,而TMD领域的专业则有影响。
德国正畸实践中研究现状与标准程序之间的差异可能导致检查过于详细。然而,这对患者的健康没有不利影响。