Becker Torsten, Kleemann Thomas, Strauss Margit, Doenges Klaus, Schneider Steffen, Senges Jochen, Seidl Karlheinz
Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen, Herzzentrum, Bremserstr. 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2008 Feb;97(2):74-82. doi: 10.1007/s00392-007-0584-y. Epub 2007 Oct 19.
We evaluated the prognostic impact of a first episode of symptomatic atrial fibrillation under real life conditions.
Most studies regarding the treatment and long-term outcome of patients with atrial fibrillation mainly refer to patients with recurrent episodes. In contrast, data on the prognostic implications of a first episode of atrial fibrillation are scarce.
Over a follow-up period of 5 years, we analyzed 1053 patients, initially scheduled for cardioversion of symptomatic atrial fibrillation, who were included into the prospective registry ANTIK (Ludwigshafener ANTIKoagulationsstudie).
Of those, 618 patients (59%) were included with a first episode of symptomatic atrial fibrillation whereas 435 patients (41%) presented with recurrent episodes. As a consequence of referral for cardioversion of symptomatic atrial fibrillation, structural heart disease was newly diagnosed in a significantly higher proportion of patients with a first episode (27 vs 13%, OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.7-3.3) and patients with a first episode were more likely to have an EF</=40% (21 vs 15%, OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.2). After 5 years, the mortality rate for patients with a first episode was higher than for those with recurrent episodes (27 vs 16%, OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4-2.7). In the multivariate analysis, a first episode also was independently associated with an increased longterm mortality (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.02-1.98). In contrast to patients with recurrent episodes, a first episode was associated with a significantly higher mortality, when compared to an age-matched control group calculated from mortality tables.
The first episode of symptomatic atrial fibrillation intended for cardioversion serves as a marker for underlying cardiac diseases and is associated with impaired prognosis.
我们在现实生活条件下评估了首次有症状性房颤发作的预后影响。
大多数关于房颤患者治疗和长期预后的研究主要针对复发发作的患者。相比之下,关于首次房颤发作预后意义的数据很少。
在5年的随访期内,我们分析了1053例最初计划进行有症状性房颤复律的患者,这些患者被纳入前瞻性登记研究ANTIK(路德维希港抗凝研究)。
其中,618例患者(59%)为首次有症状性房颤发作,而435例患者(41%)为复发发作。由于有症状性房颤复律的转诊,首次发作的患者中,新诊断出结构性心脏病的比例显著更高(27%对13%,比值比2.4,95%置信区间1.7 - 3.3),且首次发作的患者更可能左心室射血分数≤40%(21%对15%,比值比1.5,95%置信区间1.1 - 2.2)。5年后,首次发作患者的死亡率高于复发发作患者(27%对16%,比值比2.0,95%置信区间1.4 - 2.7)。在多变量分析中,首次发作也与长期死亡率增加独立相关(风险比1.4,95%置信区间1.02 - 1.98)。与复发发作的患者相比,与根据死亡率表计算的年龄匹配对照组相比,首次发作与显著更高的死亡率相关。
拟进行复律的首次有症状性房颤发作是潜在心脏疾病的一个标志,且与预后不良相关。