Suppr超能文献

使用双接触翻修柄治疗人工关节周围股骨骨折。

Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with the Bicontact revision stem.

作者信息

Eingartner C, Ochs U, Egetemeyer D, Volkmann R

机构信息

Unit for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Caritas Hospital, Uhlandstrasse 7, Bad Mergentheim, Germany.

出版信息

Z Orthop Unfall. 2007 Sep-Oct;145 Suppl 1:S29-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965657.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Periprosthetic fractures in cases without prior loosening of the stem can be treated with open reduction and internal fixation, but cases with preexisting loosening and/or bone defects present specific challenges to the surgeon. The keys to the success of intramedullary stabilization of femoral fractures--reconstruction of length, axis and rotation rather than meticulous reduction of the fragments and minimal impact on fragment vascularization by the surgical approach--can be transferred to the treatment of periprosthetic fractures.

METHOD

The Bicontact revision stem can be regarded as a combination of an interlocking nail in its distal part and a proximally coated femoral stem in its proximal part. The transfemoral approach respects the vascularization of the bone, although it is not minimally invasive. Forty-one patients with a mean age of 72.3 years and a periprosthetic fracture were included in this study. According to the Vancouver classification there were 2 type A fractures of the trochanteric region, 14 were B1, 8 were B2 with prior loosening, 13 were B3 with significant bone loss, and 2 fractures were distal to the tip of the prosthesis (type C).

RESULTS

In all patients, intramedullary stabilization with a Bicontact revision stem was performed. All but three fractures healed (pathologic fracture with multiple myeloma in one case, impaired bone healing in two cases). In 7 patients, further procedures had to be undertaken (new periprosthetic fracture in 2, loosening and revision with a standard prosthesis in 2, revision with a long stem prosthesis together with bone grafting in 3 cases). At follow-up, after a mean of 4.3 years, all patients were able to walk, and the mean Harris Hip Score was 71.1 points.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, combined application of the principles of intramedullary nailing and of uncemented total hip replacement by use of the distally interlocked Bicontact revision stem enables successful treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures.

摘要

目的

对于假体柄未预先松动的病例,假体周围骨折可采用切开复位内固定治疗,但存在假体预先松动和/或骨缺损的病例给外科医生带来了特殊挑战。股骨骨折髓内固定成功的关键——恢复长度、轴线和旋转,而非细致地复位骨折碎片以及手术入路对碎片血管化的最小影响——可应用于假体周围骨折的治疗。

方法

双接触翻修柄可视为其远端为交锁髓内钉、近端为近端涂层股骨柄的组合。经股骨入路虽不是微创入路,但保留了骨的血供。本研究纳入了41例平均年龄72.3岁的假体周围骨折患者。根据温哥华分类,转子区有2例A型骨折,14例B1型,8例B2型且伴有预先松动,13例B3型伴有严重骨丢失,2例骨折位于假体尖端远端(C型)。

结果

所有患者均采用双接触翻修柄进行髓内固定。除3例骨折未愈合外(1例为多发性骨髓瘤病理性骨折,2例骨愈合受损),其余骨折均愈合。有7例患者需要进一步手术(2例发生新的假体周围骨折,2例假体松动并采用标准假体翻修,3例采用长柄假体翻修并植骨)。随访时,平均随访4.3年后,所有患者均能行走,平均Harris髋关节评分为71.1分。

结论

总之,通过使用远端交锁的双接触翻修柄联合应用髓内钉固定和非骨水泥型全髋关节置换的原则,能够成功治疗假体周围股骨骨折。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验