Suppr超能文献

比较美国和加拿大低收入和受教育程度较低群体的健康状况。

Comparing the health of low income and less well educated groups in the United States and Canada.

机构信息

Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Departments of Economics and Public Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Popul Health Metr. 2007 Oct 16;5:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-5-10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A limited number of health status and health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures have been used for inter-country comparisons of population health. We compared the health of Canadians and Americans using a preference-based measure.

METHODS

The Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health (JCUSH) 2002-03 conducted a comprehensive cross-sectional telephone survey on the health of community-dwelling residents in Canada and the US (n = 8688). A preference-based measure, the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), was included in the JCUSH. Health status was analyzed for the entire population and white population only in both countries. Mean HUI3 overall scores were compared for both countries. A linear regression determinants of health model was estimated to account for differences in health between Canada and the US. Estimation with bootstraps was used to derive variance estimates that account for the survey's complex sampling design of clustering and stratification.

RESULTS

Income is associated with health in both countries. In the lowest income quintile, Canadians are healthier than Americans. At lower levels of education, again Canadians are healthier than Americans. Differences in health among subjects in the JCUSH are explained by age, gender, education, income, marital status, and country of residence.

CONCLUSION

On average, population health in Canada and the US is similar. However, health disparities between Canadians and Americans exist at lower levels of education and income with Americans worse off. The results highlight the usefulness of continuous preference-based measures of population health such as the HUI3.

摘要

背景

用于国家间人群健康比较的健康状况和健康相关生活质量(HRQL)衡量标准数量有限。我们使用基于偏好的衡量标准比较了加拿大和美国的健康状况。

方法

2002-03 年加拿大/美国联合健康调查(JCUSH)对加拿大和美国的社区居民健康进行了一项全面的横断面电话调查(n=8688)。JCUSH 纳入了一种基于偏好的衡量标准,即健康效用指数标记 3 版(HUI3)。对两国的全部人口和白种人人口进行了健康状况分析。比较了两国的 HUI3 总体平均得分。估计了一个线性回归健康决定因素模型,以解释加拿大和美国之间的健康差异。使用自举法进行估计,以得出考虑到调查聚类和分层复杂抽样设计的方差估计。

结果

收入在两国都与健康相关。在收入最低的五分位数中,加拿大的健康状况优于美国。在较低的教育水平下,加拿大的健康状况再次优于美国。JCUSH 参与者之间的健康差异可由年龄、性别、教育、收入、婚姻状况和居住国来解释。

结论

平均而言,加拿大和美国的人口健康状况相似。然而,在教育和收入较低的情况下,加拿大和美国之间存在健康差距,美国人的情况更糟。研究结果突出了基于偏好的连续人群健康衡量标准(如 HUI3)的实用性。

相似文献

1
Comparing the health of low income and less well educated groups in the United States and Canada.
Popul Health Metr. 2007 Oct 16;5:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-5-10.
2
Comparing population health in the United States and Canada.
Popul Health Metr. 2010 Apr 29;8:8. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-8-8.
5
A cross-national comparative perspective on racial inequities in health: the USA versus Canada.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Jan;64(1):29-35. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.085068.
6
A comparison of the health utilities indices Mark 2 and Mark 3 in type 2 diabetes.
Med Decis Making. 2003 Nov-Dec;23(6):489-501. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03258438.
8
Comparing social determinants of self-rated health across the United States and Canada.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(1):50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.010. Epub 2011 May 18.
9
Comparing health and health care use in Canada and the United States.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jul-Aug;25(4):1133-42. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.4.1133.

引用本文的文献

4
Unexplained health inequality--is it unfair?
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Jan 31;14:11. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0138-2.
5
A three-stage approach to measuring health inequalities and inequities.
Int J Equity Health. 2014 Nov 1;13:98. doi: 10.1186/s12939-014-0098-y.
6
Societal context and the production of immigrant status-based health inequalities: a comparative study of the United States and Canada.
J Public Health Policy. 2013 May;34(2):330-44. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2013.7. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
7
Correlates of quality of life in China rural-urban female migrate workers.
Qual Life Res. 2012 Apr;21(3):495-503. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9950-3. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
8
The impact of ethnicity, place of residence and socioeconomic status on health-related quality of life: results from a Greek health survey.
Int J Public Health. 2010 Oct;55(5):391-400. doi: 10.1007/s00038-010-0171-2. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
9
Use of formal and informal care services among older people in Ireland and France.
Eur J Health Econ. 2010 Oct;11(5):499-511. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0247-1. Epub 2010 May 15.
10
Comparing population health in the United States and Canada.
Popul Health Metr. 2010 Apr 29;8:8. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-8-8.

本文引用的文献

2
Understanding the determinants of health for people with type 2 diabetes.
Am J Public Health. 2006 Sep;96(9):1649-55. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.067728. Epub 2006 Jul 27.
3
Comparing health and health care use in Canada and the United States.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jul-Aug;25(4):1133-42. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.4.1133.
9
The Health Utilities Index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Oct 16;1:54. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-54.
10
Income inequality, household income, and health status in Canada: a prospective cohort study.
Am J Public Health. 2003 Aug;93(8):1287-93. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.8.1287.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验