Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Departments of Economics and Public Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Popul Health Metr. 2007 Oct 16;5:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-5-10.
A limited number of health status and health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures have been used for inter-country comparisons of population health. We compared the health of Canadians and Americans using a preference-based measure.
The Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health (JCUSH) 2002-03 conducted a comprehensive cross-sectional telephone survey on the health of community-dwelling residents in Canada and the US (n = 8688). A preference-based measure, the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), was included in the JCUSH. Health status was analyzed for the entire population and white population only in both countries. Mean HUI3 overall scores were compared for both countries. A linear regression determinants of health model was estimated to account for differences in health between Canada and the US. Estimation with bootstraps was used to derive variance estimates that account for the survey's complex sampling design of clustering and stratification.
Income is associated with health in both countries. In the lowest income quintile, Canadians are healthier than Americans. At lower levels of education, again Canadians are healthier than Americans. Differences in health among subjects in the JCUSH are explained by age, gender, education, income, marital status, and country of residence.
On average, population health in Canada and the US is similar. However, health disparities between Canadians and Americans exist at lower levels of education and income with Americans worse off. The results highlight the usefulness of continuous preference-based measures of population health such as the HUI3.
用于国家间人群健康比较的健康状况和健康相关生活质量(HRQL)衡量标准数量有限。我们使用基于偏好的衡量标准比较了加拿大和美国的健康状况。
2002-03 年加拿大/美国联合健康调查(JCUSH)对加拿大和美国的社区居民健康进行了一项全面的横断面电话调查(n=8688)。JCUSH 纳入了一种基于偏好的衡量标准,即健康效用指数标记 3 版(HUI3)。对两国的全部人口和白种人人口进行了健康状况分析。比较了两国的 HUI3 总体平均得分。估计了一个线性回归健康决定因素模型,以解释加拿大和美国之间的健康差异。使用自举法进行估计,以得出考虑到调查聚类和分层复杂抽样设计的方差估计。
收入在两国都与健康相关。在收入最低的五分位数中,加拿大的健康状况优于美国。在较低的教育水平下,加拿大的健康状况再次优于美国。JCUSH 参与者之间的健康差异可由年龄、性别、教育、收入、婚姻状况和居住国来解释。
平均而言,加拿大和美国的人口健康状况相似。然而,在教育和收入较低的情况下,加拿大和美国之间存在健康差距,美国人的情况更糟。研究结果突出了基于偏好的连续人群健康衡量标准(如 HUI3)的实用性。