Evenhuis Christopher J, Hruska Vlastimil, Guijt Rosanne M, Macka Miroslav, Gas Bohuslav, Marriott Philip J, Haddad Paul R
Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science, University of Tasmania, School of Chemistry, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Electrophoresis. 2007 Oct;28(20):3759-66. doi: 10.1002/elps.200700343.
Ionic electrophoretic mobilities determined by means of CE experiments are sometimes different when compared to generally accepted values based on limiting ionic conductance measurements. While the effect of ionic strength on electrophoretic mobility has been long understood, the increase in the mobility that results from Joule heating (the resistive heating that occurs when a current passes through an electrolyte) has been largely overlooked. In this work, a simple method for obtaining reliable and reproducible values of electrophoretic mobility is described. The electrophoretic mobility is measured over a range of driving powers and the extrapolation to zero power dissipation is employed to eliminate the effect of Joule heating. These extrapolated values of electrophoretic mobility can then be used to calculate limiting ionic mobilities by making a correction for ionic strength; this somewhat complicated calculation is conveniently performed by using the freeware program PeakMaster 5. These straightforward procedures improve the agreement between experimentally determined and literature values of limiting ionic mobility by at least one order of magnitude. Using Tris-chromate BGE with a value of conductivity 0.34 S/m and ionic strength 59 mM at a modest dissipated power per unit length of 2.0 W/m, values of mobility for inorganic anions were increased by an average of 12.6% relative to their values free from the effects of Joule heating. These increases were accompanied by a reduction in mobilities due to the ionic strength effect, which was 11% for univalent and 28% for divalent inorganic ions compared to their limiting ionic mobilities. Additionally, it was possible to determine the limiting ionic mobility for a number of aromatic anions by using PeakMaster 5 to perform an ionic strength correction. A major significance of this work is in being able to use CE to obtain reliable and accurate values of electrophoretic mobilities with all its benefits, including understanding and interpretation of physicochemical phenomena and the ability to model and simulate such phenomena accurately.
通过毛细管电泳(CE)实验测定的离子电泳迁移率,与基于极限离子电导率测量得到的普遍接受值相比,有时会有所不同。虽然离子强度对电泳迁移率的影响早已为人所知,但焦耳热(电流通过电解质时产生的电阻性发热)导致的迁移率增加在很大程度上被忽视了。在这项工作中,描述了一种获得可靠且可重复的电泳迁移率值的简单方法。在一系列驱动功率下测量电泳迁移率,并采用外推至零功耗的方法来消除焦耳热的影响。然后,通过对离子强度进行校正,这些外推得到的电泳迁移率值可用于计算极限离子迁移率;使用免费软件PeakMaster 5可以方便地进行这种稍微复杂的计算。这些直接的程序使实验测定的极限离子迁移率与文献值之间的一致性至少提高了一个数量级。使用电导率为0.34 S/m、离子强度为59 mM的 Tris - 铬酸盐背景电解质(BGE),在每单位长度适度的耗散功率为2.0 W/m时,无机阴离子的迁移率值相对于不受焦耳热影响的值平均增加了12.6%。这些增加伴随着由于离子强度效应导致的迁移率降低,与它们的极限离子迁移率相比,单价无机离子降低了11%,二价无机离子降低了28%。此外,通过使用PeakMaster 5进行离子强度校正,可以确定多种芳香族阴离子的极限离子迁移率。这项工作的一个主要意义在于能够利用毛细管电泳获得可靠且准确的电泳迁移率值及其所有益处,包括理解和解释物理化学现象以及准确建模和模拟此类现象的能力。