Dixon David A, Wang Tsang-Hsiu, Grant Daniel J, Peterson Kirk A, Christe Karl O, Schrobilgen Gary J
Department of Chemistry, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487-0336, USA.
Inorg Chem. 2007 Nov 12;46(23):10016-21. doi: 10.1021/ic701313h. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
Atomization energies at 0 K and heats of formation at 0 and 298 K are predicted for KrF+, KrF-, KrF2, KrF3+, KrF4, KrF5+, and KrF6 from coupled-cluster theory (CCSD(T)) calculations with effective core potential correlation-consistent basis sets for krypton. To achieve near chemical accuracy (+/-1 kcal/mol), three corrections were added to the complete basis set binding energies based on frozen core coupled-cluster theory energies: a correction for core-valence effects, a correction for scalar relativistic effects, and a correction for first-order atomic spin-orbit effects. Vibrational zero point energies were computed at the coupled-cluster level of theory. The calculated value for the heat of formation of KrF2 is in excellent agreement with the experimental value. Contrary to the analogous xenon fluorides, KrF2, KrF4, and KrF6 are predicted to be thermodynamically unstable with respect to loss of F2. An analysis of the energetics of KrF4 and KrF6 with respect to fluorine atom loss together with calculations of the transition states for the intramolecular loss of F2 show that fluorine atom loss is the limiting factor determining the kinetic stabilities of these molecules. Whereas KrF4 possesses a marginal energy barrier of 10 kcal/mol toward fluorine atom loss and might be stable at moderately low temperatures, the corresponding barrier in KrF6 is only 0.9 kcal/mol, suggesting that it could exist only at very low temperatures. Although the simultaneous reactions of either two or four fluorine atoms with KrF2 to give KrF4 or KrF6, respectively, are exothermic, they do not represent feasible synthetic approaches because the attack of the fluorine ligands of KrF2 by the fluorine atoms, resulting in F2 abstraction, is thermodynamically favored over oxidative fluorination of the krypton central atom. Therefore, KrF6 could exist only at very low temperatures, and even the preparation of KrF4 will be extremely difficult.
通过使用氪的有效核势相关一致基组进行耦合簇理论(CCSD(T))计算,预测了0 K时的雾化能以及0和298 K时的生成热,涉及KrF⁺、KrF⁻、KrF₂、KrF₃⁺、KrF₄、KrF₅⁺和KrF₆。为了达到接近化学精度(±1 kcal/mol),基于冻结核心耦合簇理论能量,对完整基组结合能添加了三种校正:核心价效应校正、标量相对论效应校正和一阶原子自旋轨道效应校正。在耦合簇理论水平上计算了振动零点能。计算得到的KrF₂生成热与实验值非常吻合。与类似的氙氟化物相反,预计KrF₂、KrF₄和KrF₆相对于F₂损失在热力学上是不稳定的。对KrF₄和KrF₆关于氟原子损失的能量学分析以及分子内F₂损失的过渡态计算表明,氟原子损失是决定这些分子动力学稳定性的限制因素。虽然KrF₄对氟原子损失具有10 kcal/mol的边际能垒,在适度低温下可能稳定,但KrF₆中的相应能垒仅为0.9 kcal/mol,表明它只能在非常低的温度下存在。尽管两个或四个氟原子分别与KrF₂同时反应生成KrF₄或KrF₆是放热的,但它们并不代表可行的合成方法,因为氟原子对KrF₂氟配体的攻击导致F₂夺取,在热力学上比氪中心原子的氧化氟化更有利。因此,KrF₆只能在非常低的温度下存在,甚至制备KrF₄也将极其困难。