Kaya B Ureyen, Kececi Ayşe Diljin, Belli S
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Dec;104(6):e66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.06.024. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
To compare the sealing ability of gutta-percha and thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based systems along the root canals using a recently introduced glucose penetration model.
Premolars (n = 156) instrumented to an apical size of .06/40 were divided into 12 experimental and 2 control groups. The root canals were filled with either gutta-percha (groups 1-6) or Resilon (groups 7-12) core materials combined with AH Plus (groups 1, 4, 7, 0), Ketac Endo (groups 1, 5, 8, 11), or Epiphany (groups 2, 6, 9, 12), using cold lateral compaction (groups 1-3, 7-9) or System B with Obtura II (groups 4-6, 10-12). The leaked glucose concentration was measured spectrophotometrically at 1, 8, 15, 22, and 30 days. Percentage leaking of each group was also calculated. Data were recorded as mmol/L and statistically analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (P = .05).
Throughout the experimental period Resilon/Ketac-Endo/cold lateral compaction (group 8) showed the highest mean cumulative glucose penetration (mmol/L) (17.27 +/- 10.32), whereas Resilon/AH Plus/cold lateral compaction (group 7) had the least (3.36 +/- 4.65) (P < .05). At the 30(th) day, the least leaking percentage was observed in gutta-percha, Epiphany/cold lateral compaction (group 3). Glucose penetration was affected by the obturation technique in some groups. Ketac-Endo either with gutta-percha (group 2) or Resilon (group 8) indicated significantly less glucose penetration in warm technique, whereas gutta-percha/Epiphany (group 3) had significantly less glucose penetration in cold technique (P < .05).
All material/technique combinations allowed glucose penetration. Gutta-percha/AH Plus combinations allowed similar patterns of glucose penetration to Resilon/Epiphany combinations.
使用最近引入的葡萄糖渗透模型,比较牙胶和热塑性合成聚合物基系统沿根管的封闭能力。
将预备至根尖尺寸为0.06/40的前磨牙(n = 156)分为12个实验组和2个对照组。根管分别用牙胶(第1 - 6组)或Resilon(第7 - 12组)核心材料与AH Plus(第1、4、7、10组)、Ketac Endo(第1、5、8、11组)或Epiphany(第2、6、9、12组)联合充填,采用冷侧向加压法(第1 - 3、7 - 9组)或System B加Obtura II(第4 - 6、10 - 12组)。在第1、8、15、22和30天用分光光度法测量渗漏的葡萄糖浓度。还计算了每组的渗漏百分比。数据记录为mmol/L,并采用Kruskal - Wallis和Mann - Whitney U检验进行统计学分析(P = 0.05)。
在整个实验期间,Resilon/Ketac - Endo/冷侧向加压法(第8组)显示出最高的平均累积葡萄糖渗透量(mmol/L)(17.27±10.32),而Resilon/AH Plus/冷侧向加压法(第7组)最低(3.36±4.65)(P < 0.05)。在第30天,牙胶、Epiphany/冷侧向加压法(第3组)的渗漏百分比最低。在一些组中,葡萄糖渗透受充填技术影响。Ketac Endo与牙胶(第2组)或Resilon(第8组)联合时,在热技术下显示出显著较少的葡萄糖渗透,而牙胶/Epiphany(第3组)在冷技术下葡萄糖渗透显著较少(P < 0.05)。
所有材料/技术组合均允许葡萄糖渗透。牙胶/AH Plus组合与Resilon/Epiphany组合的葡萄糖渗透模式相似。