Saarenpää I, Heikkinen T, Ristiniemi J, Hyvönen P, Leppilahti J, Jalovaara P
Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, P.O. Box 5000, 90014, Oulu, Finland.
Int Orthop. 2009 Feb;33(1):255-60. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0458-y. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
The aim of this prospective matched-pair (age, sex, fracture type, residential status, and walking ability at fracture) study was to analyse the short-term outcome after Gamma nail (GN) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation, focusing especially on functional aspects (Standardised Audit of Hip Fractures in Europe [SAHFE] hip fracture follow-up forms), reoperations, and mortality. Both groups consisted of 134 patients. DHS and GN groups did not differ significantly with respect to location of residence at 4 months or returning to the prefracture dwelling (78% vs. 73%, P = 0.224). The change in walking ability at 4 months compared to prefracture situation was better in the DHS group (p = 0.042), although there was no difference in the change of use of walking aids. The frequency of reoperations during the first year was somewhat lower in the DHS group (8.2% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.318). Mortality was lower in the DHS group both at 4 months (6.0% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.061) and 12 months (14.9% vs. 23.9%, p = 0.044). Although walking ability was better and mortality lower in the DHS group, both methods are useful in the treatment of trochanteric femoral fractures.
这项前瞻性配对(年龄、性别、骨折类型、居住状况以及骨折时的行走能力)研究的目的是分析伽马钉(GN)和动力髋螺钉(DHS)固定后的短期结果,特别关注功能方面(欧洲髋部骨折标准化审计[SAHFE]髋部骨折随访表格)、再次手术和死亡率。两组均由134例患者组成。DHS组和GN组在4个月时的居住地点或返回骨折前住所方面无显著差异(78%对73%,P = 0.224)。与骨折前情况相比,DHS组在4个月时行走能力的改善更好(p = 0.042),尽管在助行器使用的变化方面没有差异。DHS组第一年再次手术的频率略低(8.2%对12.7%,p = 0.318)。DHS组在4个月时(6.0%对13.4%,p = 0.061)和12个月时(14.9%对23.9%,p = 0.044)的死亡率均较低。尽管DHS组的行走能力更好且死亡率更低,但两种方法在股骨转子间骨折的治疗中都很有用。