• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加压髋螺钉与伽马钉的前瞻性对比研究

A prospective comparative study of the compression hip screw and the gamma nail.

作者信息

Goldhagen P R, O'Connor D R, Schwarze D, Schwartz E

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn and Queens, Jamaica, NY 11432.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 1994 Oct;8(5):367-72. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199410000-00001.

DOI:10.1097/00005131-199410000-00001
PMID:7996318
Abstract

Achieving bony union and early weight bearing in peritrochanteric femur fractures poses a continuous challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. Current standards of surgical fixation for the myriad possible fracture patterns include the compression hip screw (CHS), the 90 degrees/95 degrees blade plate, and locked intramedullary nails. The gamma nail (GN) was designed as a "hybrid" of these devices, combining theoretical biomechanical advantages that should allow earlier postoperative weight bearing with surgical technique advantages that should decrease operative morbidity. Because these theoretical advantages were unproven in a clinical setting, we prospectively randomized 75 consecutive patients with peritrochanteric femur fractures into two groups to examine the fixation of these fractures with the GN as compared to the CHS. We found no significant differences in preoperative or intraoperative parameters. Postoperatively, the subtrochanteric fracture group treated with the GN achieved earlier weightbearing status, although this was not statistically significant. 72 patients were available for follow-up at a minimum of 6 months. All fractures had clinically and radiographically healed, and 94% of the patients continued to be ambulatory. Major complications included missed distal locking screws (one patient), cutting out of the lag screw superiorly in the femoral head (two patients), and a femur fracture at the distal end of the GN (one patient). In our series, the GN produced clinical results commensurate with current standards of fixation for peritrochanteric femur fractures. Although the GN allowed earlier independent weightbearing status in patients with subtrochanteric fractures, the procedure was technically more demanding and had a significant learning curve.

摘要

在股骨转子周围骨折中实现骨愈合和早期负重,对骨科医生来说一直是一项持续的挑战。针对众多可能的骨折类型,目前的手术固定标准包括加压髋螺钉(CHS)、90度/95度角钢板以及锁定髓内钉。伽马钉(GN)被设计为这些器械的“混合体”,它结合了理论上的生物力学优势,应能使患者术后更早负重,同时具备手术技术优势,应能降低手术发病率。由于这些理论优势在临床环境中尚未得到证实,我们将75例连续的股骨转子周围骨折患者前瞻性地随机分为两组,以研究使用GN与CHS固定这些骨折的情况。我们发现术前或术中参数无显著差异。术后,接受GN治疗的转子下骨折组患者达到了更早的负重状态,尽管这在统计学上并不显著。72例患者至少随访了6个月。所有骨折在临床和影像学上均已愈合,94%的患者仍可行走。主要并发症包括远端锁定螺钉遗漏(1例患者)、拉力螺钉在股骨头上方穿出(2例患者)以及GN远端的股骨骨折(1例患者)。在我们的系列研究中,GN产生的临床结果与目前股骨转子周围骨折的固定标准相当。尽管GN使转子下骨折患者能更早独立负重,但该手术在技术上要求更高,且有明显的学习曲线。

相似文献

1
A prospective comparative study of the compression hip screw and the gamma nail.加压髋螺钉与伽马钉的前瞻性对比研究
J Orthop Trauma. 1994 Oct;8(5):367-72. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199410000-00001.
2
Comparison of compression hip screw and gamma nail for treatment of peritrochanteric fractures.加压髋螺钉与伽马钉治疗股骨转子周围骨折的比较。
J South Orthop Assoc. 1997 Fall;6(3):173-9.
3
Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw.动力髋螺钉联合转子稳定钢板治疗不稳定型股骨近端骨折:与Gamma钉及加压髋螺钉的对比研究
J Orthop Trauma. 1998 May;12(4):241-8. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199805000-00005.
4
[Gamma nail osteosynthesis of per- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures. 4 years experiences and their consequences for further implant development].[Gamma钉治疗股骨转子周围及转子下骨折的骨内固定术。4年经验及其对进一步植入物研发的影响]
Chirurg. 1994 Nov;65(11):953-63.
5
Early experience with the gamma interlocking nail for peritrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur.
J Trauma. 1991 Dec;31(12):1649-58. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199112000-00015.
6
Immediate weight-bearing after treatment of a comminuted fracture of the femoral shaft with a statically locked intramedullary nail.使用静力锁定髓内钉治疗股骨干粉碎性骨折后立即负重。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Nov;81(11):1538-44. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199911000-00005.
7
Embedding the lateral end of the lag screw within the lateral wall in the repair of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric femur fracture.在股骨转子间反向斜形骨折修复中,将拉力螺钉的外侧端埋入外侧壁。
J Int Med Res. 2018 Mar;46(3):1103-1108. doi: 10.1177/0300060517726195. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
8
A randomized study of the compression hip screw and Gamma nail in 426 fractures.一项针对426例骨折患者的加压髋螺钉与Gamma钉的随机研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Aug(401):209-22. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200208000-00024.
9
Comparison and analysis of reoperations in two different treatment protocols for trochanteric hip fractures - postoperative technical complications with dynamic hip screw, intramedullary nail and Medoff sliding plate.两种不同治疗方案治疗股骨转子间骨折再手术的比较与分析——动力髋螺钉、髓内钉及梅多夫滑动钢板术后技术并发症
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Aug 24;18(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1723-x.
10
Use of an intramedullary hip-screw compared with a compression hip-screw with a plate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. A prospective, randomized study of one hundred patients.髓内髋螺钉与带钢板的加压髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的比较。一项对100例患者的前瞻性随机研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 May;80(5):618-30. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199805000-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective Research Comparing Different Trochanteric Fracture Fixation Techniques.比较不同股骨转子骨折固定技术的前瞻性研究
Cureus. 2024 Aug 25;16(8):e67774. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67774. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Factors associated with postoperative quality of life in patients with intertrochanteric fracture.股骨转子间骨折患者术后生活质量的相关因素
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Dec 11;86(2):703-711. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001608. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.
老年人髋关节囊外骨折的手术干预:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 10;2(2):CD013405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013405.pub2.
4
Cephalomedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in older adults.头髓钉与髓外植入物治疗老年人囊外髋部骨折。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 26;1(1):CD000093. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000093.pub6.
5
Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation in the treatment of subtrochanteric femur fractures: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.髓内固定与髓外固定治疗股骨转子下骨折的综合系统评价与Meta分析
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Nov;54(6):639-646. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19216.
6
Optimal surgical methods to treat intertrochanteric fracture: a Bayesian network meta-analysis based on 36 randomized controlled trials.治疗股骨转子间骨折的最佳手术方法:基于 36 项随机对照试验的贝叶斯网状 Meta 分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Sep 10;15(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01943-9.
7
Comparison of internal fixation with Gamma3 Long nails and INTERTAN nails in the treatment of Seinsheimer type V subtrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients.Gamma3长钉与INTERTAN钉内固定治疗老年患者Seinsheimer V型股骨转子下骨折的比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(25):e16140. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016140.
8
Clinical Outcomes of U-blade Gamma3 Nails Used to Treat Patients with Trochanteric Fractures: Retrospective Multicenter Study.使用U型Gamma3钉治疗转子间骨折患者的临床结果:回顾性多中心研究
Hip Pelvis. 2019 Jun;31(2):95-101. doi: 10.5371/hp.2019.31.2.95. Epub 2019 May 30.
9
Comparing surgical interventions for intertrochanteric hip fracture by blood loss and operation time: a network meta-analysis.比较不同手术方式治疗股骨转子间骨折的术中出血量和手术时间:网状 Meta 分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jun 22;13(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0852-8.
10
A comparison of two fixation methods for femoral trochanteric fractures: a new generation intramedullary system sliding hip screw.股骨转子间骨折两种固定方法的比较:新一代髓内系统与动力髋螺钉
Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2017 Jan-Apr;14(1):40-47. doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2017.14.1.040. Epub 2017 May 30.