Annane D, Orlikowski D, Chevret S, Chevrolet J C, Raphaël J C
Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Critical Care Department, 104. Boulevard Raymond Poincaré, Garches, Ile de France, France, 92380.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD001941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001941.pub2.
Chronic alveolar hypoventilation is a common complication of many neuromuscular and chest wall disorders. Long-term nocturnal mechanical ventilation is increasingly used to treat it.
To examine the efficacy of nocturnal mechanical ventilation in relieving hypoventilation related symptoms and in prolonging survival in people with neuromuscular or chest wall disorders.
We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register, MEDLINE (from January 1966 to June 2006), and EMBASE (from January 1980 to June 2006) for randomised trials and contacted authors of trials and other experts in the field.
We searched for quasi-randomised or randomised controlled trials of participants with neuromuscular or chest wall disorder-related stable chronic hypoventilation of all ages and all degrees of severity, receiving any type and any mode of nocturnal mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome measure was short-term and long-term reversal of hypoventilation related clinical symptoms and secondary outcomes were unplanned hospital admission, one year mortality, short-term and long-term reversal of daytime hypercapnia, improvement of lung function and sleep breathing disorders.
We identified eight randomised trials.
The eight eligible trials included a total of 144 participants. The relative risk of 'no improvement of hypoventilation related clinical symptoms' in the short-term following nocturnal mechanical ventilation was available in only one trial with 10 participants and was not significant, 0.09 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 1.31). The relative risk of 'no reversal of daytime hypercapnia' in the short-term following nocturnal ventilation was significant and favoured treatment, 0.37 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.65). The weighted mean difference of nocturnal mean oxygen saturation was 5.45% (95% CI 1.47 to 9.44) more improvement in participants treated with nocturnal mechanical ventilation. For most of the outcome measures there was no significant long-term difference between nocturnal mechanical ventilation and no ventilation. However, the estimated risk of death based on three studies was reduced following nocturnal ventilation, 0.62 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.91). There was considerable and significant heterogeneity between the trials possibly related to differences between the study populations. Most of the secondary outcomes were not assessed in the eligible trials. Data from two crossover trials suggested no evidence for a difference in reversal of daytime hypercapnia and sleep study parameters between volume-cycled and pressure-cycled ventilation. No data could be summarised for the comparisons between invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation or between intermittent positive pressure and negative pressure ventilation.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence about the therapeutic benefit of mechanical ventilation is weak, but consistent, suggesting alleviation of the symptoms of chronic hypoventilation in the short-term. In three small studies survival was prolonged mainly in participants with motor neuron diseases. With the exception of motor neuron disease, further larger randomised trials are needed to confirm long-term beneficial effects of nocturnal mechanical ventilation on quality of life, morbidity and mortality, to assess its cost-benefit ratio in neuromuscular and chest wall diseases and to compare the different types and modes of ventilation.
慢性肺泡低通气是许多神经肌肉和胸壁疾病的常见并发症。长期夜间机械通气越来越多地用于治疗该病。
探讨夜间机械通气对缓解神经肌肉或胸壁疾病患者低通气相关症状及延长生存期的疗效。
我们检索了Cochrane神经肌肉疾病组试验注册库、MEDLINE(1966年1月至2006年6月)和EMBASE(1980年1月至2006年6月)中的随机试验,并联系了试验作者及该领域的其他专家。
我们检索了所有年龄和严重程度的神经肌肉或胸壁疾病相关稳定慢性低通气患者的半随机或随机对照试验,这些患者接受任何类型和模式的夜间机械通气。主要结局指标是低通气相关临床症状的短期和长期逆转,次要结局是计划外住院、一年死亡率、白天高碳酸血症的短期和长期逆转、肺功能改善及睡眠呼吸障碍。
我们确定了8项随机试验。
8项符合条件的试验共纳入144名参与者。仅1项纳入10名参与者的试验提供了夜间机械通气后短期内“低通气相关临床症状无改善”的相对风险,差异无统计学意义,为0.09(95%置信区间(CI)0.01至1.31)。夜间通气后短期内“白天高碳酸血症未逆转”的相对风险有统计学意义且支持治疗,为0.37(95%CI 0.20至0.65)。夜间机械通气治疗的参与者夜间平均血氧饱和度加权平均差改善了5.45%(95%CI 1.47至9.44)。对于大多数结局指标,夜间机械通气与未通气之间长期差异无统计学意义。然而,基于三项研究估计夜间通气后死亡风险降低,为0.62(95%CI 0.42至0.91)。试验之间存在相当大且显著的异质性,可能与研究人群差异有关。大多数次要结局在符合条件的试验中未评估。两项交叉试验的数据表明,容量控制通气和压力控制通气在白天高碳酸血症逆转及睡眠研究参数方面无差异。无法总结有创与无创机械通气或间歇正压与负压通气之间比较的数据。
目前关于机械通气治疗益处的证据薄弱但一致,提示可在短期内缓解慢性低通气症状。在三项小型研究中,主要是运动神经元疾病患者生存期延长。除运动神经元疾病外,需要进一步开展更大规模的随机试验,以确认夜间机械通气对生活质量、发病率和死亡率的长期有益影响,评估其在神经肌肉和胸壁疾病中的成本效益比,并比较不同类型和模式的通气。