Osborn D A, Sinn J K
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, RPA Newborn Care, Missenden Road, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia, 2050.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD006474. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006474.pub2.
The composition of the intestinal microflora may be different in individuals with atopic eczema from those without this condition, and such differences may precede the development of eczema. Prebiotics are nondigestible food components that benefit the host by selectively stimulating the growth or activity of non-pathogenic bacteria in the colon. Prebiotics (commonly oligosaccharides) added to infant feeds have the potential to prevent sensitisation of infants to dietary allergens.
To determine the effect of prebiotics given to infants for the prevention of allergic disease or food hypersensitivity.
This included searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 1, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 - February 2007), EMBASE, PREMEDLINE, abstracts of conference proceedings and citations of published articles, and expert informants.
Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared the use of a prebiotic to no prebiotic; or the use a specific prebiotic compared to a different prebiotic.
Assessment of trial quality, data extraction and synthesis of data were performed using standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.
Seven studies were eligible for inclusion. Only two studies reported an allergic disease outcome for 432 infants. Study quality was reasonable, although Moro 2006 reported 20% post-randomisation losses. Moro 2006 enrolled hydrolysed formula fed infants at high risk of allergy and reported a significant reduction in eczema in infants up to six months of age (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21, 0.84). Ziegler 2007 enrolled formula fed infants who were not selected on the basis of risk for allergy and reported no significant difference in eczema up to four months of age (RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.62, 4.26). Meta-analysis of the two studies found no significant difference in eczema, but significant heterogeneity was detected. Differences were potentially attributable to differences in infant risk, prebiotic formulation or measurement of eczema. Analysis of five studies reporting measures of infant growth found no consistent adverse effects.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to determine the role of prebiotic supplementation of infant formula for prevention of allergic disease and food hypersensitivity. One small trial of prebiotic oligosaccharides with excess losses reported a reduction in eczema in high risk formula fed infants. Further trials are needed to determine whether this finding persists over a longer period of time, applies to other manifestations of allergic disease, is associated with reductions in allergen sensitisation, and is reproducible.
特应性皮炎患者的肠道微生物群组成可能与非特应性皮炎患者不同,且这些差异可能先于湿疹的发生。益生元是不可消化的食物成分,通过选择性刺激结肠中无害细菌的生长或活性而使宿主受益。添加到婴儿食品中的益生元(通常为低聚糖)有可能预防婴儿对食物过敏原的致敏。
确定给予婴儿益生元对预防过敏性疾病或食物过敏的效果。
检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(2007年第1期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2007年2月)、EMBASE、PREMEDLINE、会议论文摘要和已发表文章的参考文献,以及专家提供的信息。
比较使用益生元与不使用益生元,或比较使用一种特定益生元与另一种不同益生元的随机和半随机对照试验。
采用Cochrane新生儿回顾组的标准方法进行试验质量评估、数据提取和数据综合分析。
七项研究符合纳入标准。只有两项研究报告了432名婴儿的过敏性疾病结局。研究质量合理,尽管Moro 2006报告随机分组后有20%的失访。Moro 2006纳入了过敏风险高的水解配方奶喂养婴儿,并报告6个月龄以内婴儿的湿疹显著减少(相对危险度0.42,95%可信区间0.21,0.84)。Ziegler 2007纳入了未根据过敏风险选择的配方奶喂养婴儿,并报告4个月龄以内婴儿的湿疹无显著差异(相对危险度1.62,95%可信区间0.62,4.26)。对这两项研究的荟萃分析发现湿疹无显著差异,但检测到显著的异质性。差异可能归因于婴儿风险、益生元配方或湿疹测量方法的不同。对五项报告婴儿生长指标的研究分析发现没有一致的不良影响。
没有足够的证据确定在婴儿配方奶中添加益生元对预防过敏性疾病和食物过敏的作用。一项关于益生元低聚糖且有较多失访的小型试验报告称,高风险配方奶喂养婴儿的湿疹有所减少。需要进一步的试验来确定这一发现是否能在更长时间内持续存在、是否适用于过敏性疾病的其他表现、是否与过敏原致敏的减少有关以及是否可重复。