Kissoon N, Skippen P
Acute and Critical Care Programs, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Minerva Pediatr. 2007 Aug;59(4):379-88.
Mechanical ventilation, while accepted as standard therapy for critically ill infants and children with respiratory failure, has significant morbidity and mortality. While recent emphasis on low tidal volume ventilation and low airway pressures may result in decreased lung stretch and limit lung disease, adjunctive therapies have been tried to reduce the stressors of mechanical ventilation. Therapies included inhaled nitric oxide, heliox and surfactant. There are compelling physiological reasons why these drugs may be of benefit in these patients. However, our understanding of their role is hindered by studies with small numbers of patients and its use in diseases with varied pulmonary pathology. Studies have shown potential for benefit of inhaled nitric oxide in newborns with hypoxemic respiratory failure and pulmonary hypertension, surfactant in respiratory distress syndrome in preterm neonates and heliox in severe upper airway obstruction. However, the use in other respiratory conditions has led to mixed results and hence paucity of firm recommendations.
机械通气虽被公认为治疗患有呼吸衰竭的危重症婴幼儿的标准疗法,但却有着显著的发病率和死亡率。尽管近期对低潮气量通气和低气道压力的重视可能会减少肺扩张并限制肺部疾病,但人们已尝试采用辅助疗法来减轻机械通气的应激源。这些疗法包括吸入一氧化氮、氦氧混合气和表面活性剂。从生理角度来看,有令人信服的理由表明这些药物可能对这些患者有益。然而,由于患者数量较少的研究以及其在具有不同肺部病理的疾病中的应用,我们对它们作用的理解受到了阻碍。研究表明,吸入一氧化氮对患有低氧性呼吸衰竭和肺动脉高压的新生儿、表面活性剂对早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征以及氦氧混合气对严重上气道梗阻可能有益。然而,在其他呼吸疾病中的应用结果不一,因此缺乏确凿的推荐意见。