Jang G, Oh H J, Kim M K, Fibrianto Y H, Hossein M S, Kim H J, Kim J J, Hong S G, Park J E, Kang S K, Lee B C
Department of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Theriogenology. 2008 Jan 15;69(2):146-54. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.08.022. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
The purpose of the present study on canine somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) was to evaluate the effects of fusion strength, type of activation, culture media and site of transfer on developmental potential of SCNT embryos. We also examined the potential of enucleated bovine oocytes to serve as cytoplast recipients of canine somatic cells. Firstly, we evaluated the morphological characteristics of in vivo-matured canine oocytes collected by retrograde flushing of the oviducts 72 h after ovulation. Secondly, the effectiveness of three electrical strengths (1.8, 2.3 and 3.3 kV/cm), used twice for 20 micros, on fusion of canine cytoplasts with somatic cells were compared. Then, we compared: (1) chemical versus electrical activation (a) after parthenogenetic activation or (b) after reconstruction of canine oocytes with somatic cells; (2) culture of resulting intergeneric (IG) embryos in either (a) mSOF or (b) TCM-199. The exposure time to 6-DMAP was standardized by using bovine oocytes reconstructed with canine somatic cells. Bovine oocytes were used for SCNT after a 22 h in vitro maturation interval. The fusion rate was significantly higher in the 3.3 kV/cm group than in the 1.8 and 2.3 kV/cm treatment groups. After parthenogenesis or SCNT with chemical activation, 3.4 and 5.8%, respectively, of the embryos developed to the morula stage, as compared to none of the embryos produced using electrical activation. Later developmental stages (8-16 cells) were transferred to the uterine horn of eight recipients, but no pregnancy was detected. However, IG cloned embryos (bovine cytoplast/canine somatic cell) were capable of in vitro blastocyst development. In vitro developmental competence of IG cloned embryos was improved after exposure to 6-DMAP for 4 h as compared to 0, 2 or 6h exposure, although the increase was not significantly different among culture media. In summary, for production of canine SCNT embryos, we recommend fusion at 3.3 kV/cm, chemical activation, culture in mSOF medium and transfer of presumptive zygotes to the oviduct of recipient animals. The feasibility of IG production of cloned canine embryos using bovine cytoplasts as recipient of canine somatic cells was demonstrated.
本项关于犬体细胞克隆(SCNT)的研究目的是评估融合强度、激活类型、培养基及移植部位对SCNT胚胎发育潜能的影响。我们还研究了去核牛卵母细胞作为犬体细胞胞质受体的潜力。首先,我们评估了排卵72小时后通过输卵管逆行冲洗收集的体内成熟犬卵母细胞的形态特征。其次,比较了三种电场强度(1.8、2.3和3.3 kV/cm),每次施加20微秒,重复两次,对犬细胞质体与体细胞融合的效果。然后,我们比较了:(1)化学激活与电激活(a)孤雌激活后或(b)犬卵母细胞与体细胞重构后;(2)所得种间(IG)胚胎在(a)mSOF或(b)TCM - 199中的培养情况。通过使用与犬体细胞重构的牛卵母细胞来标准化6 - DMAP的暴露时间。牛卵母细胞在体外成熟22小时后用于SCNT。3.3 kV/cm组的融合率显著高于1.8和2.3 kV/cm处理组。孤雌激活或化学激活的SCNT后,分别有3.4%和5.8%的胚胎发育到桑葚胚阶段,而电激活产生的胚胎无一发育到该阶段。后期发育阶段(8 - 16细胞)被移植到8只受体动物的子宫角,但未检测到妊娠。然而,IG克隆胚胎(牛细胞质体/犬体细胞)能够在体外发育到囊胚阶段。与暴露0、2或6小时相比,IG克隆胚胎在暴露于6 - DMAP 4小时后,体外发育能力有所提高,尽管不同培养基之间的增加差异不显著。总之,为了生产犬SCNT胚胎,我们建议在3.3 kV/cm下进行融合、化学激活、在mSOF培养基中培养,并将推定的合子移植到受体动物的输卵管中。证明了使用牛细胞质体作为犬体细胞受体进行IG克隆犬胚胎生产的可行性。