Pearson David A, Bruggman Amanda R, Haukoos Jason S
Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Dec;50(6):646-52. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.07.015. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
Homeless adults visit emergency departments (EDs) nearly 4 times more often than the general population and are among the highest repeat visitors. Little research, however, has determined resource utilization patterns of homeless patients and the extent to which they may benefit from emergency care. The objectives of this study are to describe emergency medical services and hospital utilization by homeless patients and to estimate their benefit of ED care.
This was a retrospective cohort study performed at an urban safety-net hospital. All patients who presented to the ED during 2003 were identified. Simple random samples of 300 homeless adult patients and 300 nonhomeless adult patients were identified and included as the study sample. Variables collected included patient demographics, medical history, ED visit date and times, results of laboratory studies, disposition from the ED, diagnoses, ambulance use, number of previous ED visits, and estimated benefit of emergency treatment as determined by a previously developed consensus-based instrument.
Homeless patients were slightly older (41 years [interquartile range (IQR) 34 to 48 years] versus 36 years [IQR 25 to 46 years]) and had substantially higher substance abuse histories but had similar medical and psychiatric comorbidities compared with nonhomeless patients. Homeless patients also spent more time in the ED per visit (4.4 hours [IQR 2.6 to 7.5 hours] versus 3.8 hours (IQR 2.1 to 5.7 hours]), were less likely to be admitted to the hospital (8% versus 19%), and were more likely to use ambulance services (51% versus 29%). Finally, homeless patients received a similar level of estimated benefit of emergency treatment compared with nonhomeless patients, and a substantial proportion of their visits was directly related to excessive alcohol use.
Homeless adults commonly use emergency care resources, and medical benefit, although comparable to that of nonhomeless adults, is in many cases uncertain.
无家可归的成年人前往急诊科就诊的频率比普通人群高出近4倍,且是复诊率最高的人群之一。然而,很少有研究确定无家可归患者的资源利用模式以及他们可能从急诊护理中受益的程度。本研究的目的是描述无家可归患者的紧急医疗服务和医院利用情况,并评估他们从急诊护理中获得的益处。
这是一项在城市安全网医院进行的回顾性队列研究。确定了2003年期间前往急诊科就诊的所有患者。从这些患者中随机抽取300名无家可归的成年患者和300名非无家可归的成年患者作为研究样本。收集的变量包括患者人口统计学资料、病史、急诊就诊日期和时间、实验室检查结果、急诊处置情况、诊断、救护车使用情况、既往急诊就诊次数,以及根据先前制定的基于共识的工具确定的急诊治疗估计益处。
无家可归患者年龄稍大(41岁[四分位间距(IQR)34至48岁],而非无家可归患者为36岁[IQR 25至46岁]),有物质滥用史的比例显著更高,但与非无家可归患者相比,其医疗和精神合并症相似。无家可归患者每次就诊在急诊科停留的时间也更长(4.4小时[IQR 2.6至7.5小时],而非无家可归患者为3.8小时[IQR 2.1至5.7小时]),住院的可能性更小(8%对19%),使用救护车服务的可能性更大(51%对29%)。最后,与非无家可归患者相比,无家可归患者获得的急诊治疗估计益处水平相似,且他们的就诊中有很大一部分与过量饮酒直接相关。
无家可归的成年人经常使用急诊护理资源,尽管其医疗益处与非无家可归的成年人相当,但在许多情况下并不确定。