Dezza M-C, Berrevoet F, Sainz-Barriga M, Rossetto A, Colenbie L, Haentjens I, Van Vlierberghe H, Colle I, Van Huysse J, Praet M, Rogiers X, de Hemptinne B, Troisi R
Department of General Surgery, Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Service, Ghent University Hospital Medical School, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Transplant Proc. 2007 Oct;39(8):2675-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.08.008.
Donation after cardiac death has reemerged as a potential way of increasing the supply of organs for transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of non-heart-beating donor (NHBD) liver transplantation (OLT) experience and compared with standard heart-beating donation (HBD) at a single center.
From October 2003 to November 2006, 13/111 liver transplantations were performed in our institution with NHBD. Living donor liver transplantation, splitting procedures, combined, and pediatric liver transplantations were excluded from this analysis.
Donor population was similar in both groups. The median warm ischemia time was 10 minutes (range 6 to 38). The median cold ischemia times 6 hours and 16 minutes (2.4 to 6.30 hours and 9 hours and 14 minutes (2.15 to 15.35 hours) for NHBD and HBD groups, respectively (P = .0002). In the NHBD groups, 4/13 (31%) grafts were retransplanted within 3 months, due to ischemic biliary lesions with severe cholestasis (n = 3) or due to the occurrence of primary nonfunction (n = 1). The retransplantation rate was significantly lower in the HBD group (11/98, 11%; P = .03). One-year patient and graft survivals were 62% and 54% versus 86% and 79%, respectively, for the NHBD and HBD groups (P = .107 and P = .003).
Liver grafts procured from donors after cardiac death accounted for a significantly greater retransplantation rates, mainly due to nonanastomotic biliary strictures. This risk must be taken into account when transplanting such grafts. Based upon this experience, NHBD cannot rival HBD to be a comparable source of quality organs for liver transplantation.
心脏死亡后捐赠已再度成为增加移植器官供应的一种潜在方式。我们回顾性分析了非心脏跳动供体(NHBD)肝移植(OLT)的经验,并与单中心的标准心脏跳动供体(HBD)肝移植进行了比较。
2003年10月至2006年11月,我们机构共进行了13例NHBD肝移植手术(111例肝移植手术中的)。本分析排除了活体肝移植、劈离式肝移植、联合肝移植及儿童肝移植。
两组供体情况相似。NHBD组热缺血时间中位数为10分钟(范围6至38分钟)。NHBD组和HBD组冷缺血时间中位数分别为6小时16分钟(2.4至6.30小时)和9小时14分钟(2.15至15.35小时)(P = 0.0002)。在NHBD组中,13例中有4例(31%)在3个月内进行了再次移植,原因是缺血性胆管病变伴严重胆汁淤积(n = 3)或原发性无功能(n = 1)。HBD组再次移植率明显较低(98例中有11例,11%;P = 0.03)。NHBD组和HBD组1年患者及移植物存活率分别为62%和54%以及86%和79%(P = 0.107和P = 0.003)。
心脏死亡后供体获取的肝移植物再次移植率显著更高,主要原因是非吻合口胆管狭窄。移植此类移植物时必须考虑到这种风险。基于这一经验,NHBD作为肝移植优质器官的可比来源无法与HBD相媲美。