Sheuya Shaaban A
Ardhi University (formerly the University College of Lands and Architectural Studies), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Address: P.O. Box 35176, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136:298-306. doi: 10.1196/annals.1425.003. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
Urban poverty, ill health, and living in slums are intrinsically interwoven. Poverty is multidimensional and there is no agreement on a universal definition. UN-HABITAT has introduced an operational definition of slums that is restricted to legal aspects and excludes the more difficult social dimensions. The World Health Organization definition is more comprehensive and uses a health and social determinants approach that is strongly based on the social conditions in which people live and work. Health and improving the lives of people living in slums is at the top of international development agenda. Proactive strategies to contain new urban populations and slum upgrading are the two key approaches. Regarding the latter, participatory upgrading that most often involves the provision of basic infrastructure is currently the most acceptable intervention in developing countries. In urbanization of poverty, participatory slum upgrading is a necessary but not sufficient condition to reduce poverty and improve the lives of slum dwellers. Empowering interventions that target capacity development and skill transfer of both individuals and community groups--as well as meaningful negotiations with institutions, such as municipal governments, which can affect slum dwellers' lives--appear to be the most promising strategies to improve the slum dwellers' asset bases and health. Non-governmental organizations, training institutions, and international development partners are best placed to facilitate horizontal relationships between individuals, community groups, and vertical relationships with more powerful institutions that affect the slum dwellers' lives. The main challenge appears to be lack of commitment from the key stakeholders to upgrade interventions citywide.
城市贫困、健康状况不佳与居住在贫民窟这三者有着内在的紧密联系。贫困是多维度的,对于其通用定义尚无定论。联合国人居署引入了一个仅限于法律层面的贫民窟操作性定义,排除了更复杂的社会层面因素。世界卫生组织的定义则更为全面,采用了一种基于健康和社会决定因素的方法,该方法强烈依赖于人们生活和工作的社会条件。改善贫民窟居民的健康与生活状况是国际发展议程的首要任务。控制新增城市人口的积极策略和贫民窟改造是两种关键方法。就后者而言,最常涉及提供基本基础设施的参与式改造目前是发展中国家最可接受的干预措施。在贫困城市化过程中,参与式贫民窟改造是减少贫困和改善贫民窟居民生活的必要但不充分条件。针对个人和社区群体的能力发展与技能转移的赋权干预措施,以及与诸如市政府等能够影响贫民窟居民生活的机构进行有意义的谈判,似乎是改善贫民窟居民资产基础和健康状况最具前景的策略。非政府组织、培训机构和国际发展伙伴最适合促进个人、社区群体之间的横向关系,以及与影响贫民窟居民生活的更有影响力的机构之间的纵向关系。主要挑战似乎在于关键利益相关者缺乏在全市范围内推进改造干预措施的决心。