Suppr超能文献

一项随机对照试验,比较来曲唑超促排卵与重组促卵泡激素联合宫腔内人工授精,用于既往枸橼酸氯米芬刺激及宫腔内人工授精失败的不明原因不孕夫妇。

Randomized controlled trial comparing superovulation with letrozole versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone combined with intrauterine insemination for couples with unexplained infertility who had failed clomiphene citrate stimulation and intrauterine insemination.

作者信息

Gregoriou Odysseas, Vlahos Nikos F, Konidaris Socrates, Papadias Konstantinos, Botsis Dimitrios, Creatsas George K

机构信息

Aretaieion University Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2008 Sep;90(3):678-83. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.099. Epub 2007 Oct 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of letrozole to recombinant FSH for ovarian stimulation combined with IUI in a group of patients that had failed to conceive after clomiphene citrate (CC) and IUI.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized trial with human subjects.

SETTING

University-based fertility center.

PATIENT(S): Fifty couples with unexplained infertility that failed to conceive after three cycles of CC combined to IUI.

INTERVENTION(S): Couples were randomized to undergo superovulation either with letrozole or with recombinant FSH combined to IUI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy per cycle of treatment and clinical pregnancy per couple.

RESULT(S): Pregnancy rate (PR) per cycle was 8.9% in the letrozole group as compared with 14% in the gonadotropin IUI group. This resulted in a cumulative PR per couple of 24% versus 36% and a take home baby rate of 20% versus 28%. Endometrial thickness was significantly lower in the letrozole group (7.1 +/- 2.3 vs 8.6 +/- 1.8).

CONCLUSION(S): Ovarian stimulation with letrozole is associated with acceptable PRs compared with gonadotropin with significant less cost, risks, and patient inconvenience.

摘要

目的

比较来曲唑与重组促卵泡素在枸橼酸氯米芬(CC)和宫腔内人工授精(IUI)后仍未受孕的一组患者中进行卵巢刺激联合IUI的疗效。

设计

以人为对象的前瞻性随机试验。

地点

大学附属生育中心。

患者

五十对不明原因不孕的夫妇,在接受三个周期的CC联合IUI后仍未受孕。

干预措施

将夫妇随机分为接受来曲唑或重组促卵泡素联合IUI进行超排卵。

主要观察指标

每个治疗周期的临床妊娠率和每对夫妇的临床妊娠率。

结果

来曲唑组每个周期的妊娠率(PR)为8.9%,而促性腺激素IUI组为14%。这导致每对夫妇的累积PR分别为24%和36%,带回家婴儿的比率分别为20%和28%。来曲唑组的子宫内膜厚度明显更低(7.1±2.3对8.6±1.8)。

结论

与促性腺激素相比,来曲唑进行卵巢刺激的PR是可接受的,且成本、风险和患者不便显著降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验