Willemze Roel, Labar Boris
Department of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands, and University Hospital Center Rebro, Zagreb, Croatia.
Semin Hematol. 2007 Oct;44(4):267-73. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2007.08.004.
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) or autologous SCT (autoSCT) and intensive consolidation/intensification courses plus maintenance chemotherapy for 1 to 2 years are currently the major options for post-remission treatment of adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first remission. Comparison of their value with respect to relapse prevention, disease-free survival, and overall survival has been impossible until recently when the results of several randomized trials became available. Herein, we try to dissect data from these randomized trials to evaluate the role of autoSCT in patients with ALL in complete remission. Five prospectively randomized trials were found in which patients with a family donor were eligible for an alloSCT and the remaining patients were randomized between autoSCT and continuation chemotherapy. In addition, in two prospectively randomized trials all patients with a donor were eligible for an alloSCT and the remaining patients were eligible for autoSCT. Using intention to treat, in the majority of ALL studies alloSCT is superior to autoSCT or intensive continuation chemotherapy. It still has to be determined which subgroups of ALL benefit most of allogeneic transplantation, since in some trials the advantage of allogeneic transplantation was confined to the standard-risk ALL patients and in other trials to the high-risk patients. With respect to the role of autoSCT compared to continuation chemotherapy, both treatment modalities show equal, although for high-risk ALL inferior, overall survival chances. In one large trial the disease-free survival in the autoSCT arm was inferior to that in the chemotherapy arm. This finding may eventually have an impact on the overall survival rate. Currently, the main benefit of autoSCT may be its short duration compared with the continuation chemotherapy regimen.
异基因干细胞移植(alloSCT)或自体干细胞移植(autoSCT)以及强化巩固/强化疗程加1至2年的维持化疗目前是首次缓解的成年急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者缓解后治疗的主要选择。直到最近几项随机试验结果公布之前,一直无法比较它们在预防复发、无病生存和总生存方面的价值。在此,我们试图剖析这些随机试验的数据,以评估autoSCT在完全缓解的ALL患者中的作用。我们发现了五项前瞻性随机试验,其中有家族供者的患者 eligible for an alloSCT,其余患者在autoSCT和继续化疗之间随机分组。此外,在两项前瞻性随机试验中,所有有供者的患者 eligible for an alloSCT,其余患者 eligible for autoSCT。采用意向性分析,在大多数ALL研究中,alloSCT优于autoSCT或强化继续化疗。仍需确定ALL的哪些亚组从异基因移植中获益最大,因为在一些试验中,异基因移植的优势仅限于标准风险ALL患者,而在其他试验中则仅限于高危患者。关于autoSCT与继续化疗相比的作用,两种治疗方式的总生存机会相等,尽管对于高危ALL患者,autoSCT的总生存机会较差。在一项大型试验中,autoSCT组的无病生存低于化疗组。这一发现最终可能会影响总生存率。目前,autoSCT的主要益处可能是与继续化疗方案相比,其疗程较短。 (注:原文中“eligible for an alloSCT”和“eligible for autoSCT”表述不完整,推测可能是“适合进行异基因干细胞移植”和“适合进行自体干细胞移植”,但按要求未做修改。)