Finiewicz K J, Larson R A
Department of Medicine, and the Cancer Research Center, University of Chicago, IL, USA.
Semin Oncol. 1999 Feb;26(1):6-20.
Major challenges remain to be overcome to increase the cure rate for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), especially for middle-aged and older adults. Despite high rates of complete remission (CR), many patients relapse after chemotherapy alone. Dose-intensive therapy and stem-cell transplantation (SCT) have been able to rescue some of these patients. However, many patients presently are being cured using intensive consolidation chemotherapy during first remission (CRI) and at a lower cost and toxicity than with SCT. The use of SCT in CRI should be governed by an assessment of known risk factors. Among younger adults in the prime transplant age group (< 50 years), there is no advantage to allogeneic (allo)-SCT across the board, but it is recommended for those with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL or pro-B ALL with t(4;11) and possibly for those with B-lineage ALL and initial WBC counts > 100,000/microL. There is as yet no evidence that allo-SCT can improve the already high cure rate achieved with chemotherapy alone in favorable subsets such as T-cell ALL. There appears to be no advantage to autologous (auto)-SCT over chemotherapy for consolidation of either high-risk or standard-risk patients in CRI. The argument that early use of auto-SCT shortens the duration of treatment and thereby improves the quality of life is not persuasive, as there is little morbidity from maintenance chemotherapy. Patients who receive a modern, intensive multiagent chemotherapy program for CRI but later relapse are unlikely to be cured with additional chemotherapy alone. High-grade multidrug resistance develops rapidly. These patients should undergo allo-SCT if possible. Unfortunately, allo-SCT is available to only a minority of such patients because of the lack of a donor or insurance coverage, or the presence of comorbid conditions or older age. The use of alternative donors (either matched, unrelated donors or partially human leukocyte antigen [HLA] matched family members) is appropriate in this circumstance. Auto-SCT with or without previously used purging methods is ineffective for patients with advanced ALL.
要提高急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的治愈率,尤其是中年和老年患者的治愈率,仍有重大挑战有待克服。尽管完全缓解(CR)率很高,但许多患者仅接受化疗后就会复发。剂量密集疗法和干细胞移植(SCT)已能够挽救其中一些患者。然而,目前许多患者在首次缓解期(CRI)通过强化巩固化疗得以治愈,且成本和毒性均低于SCT。CRI期SCT的使用应基于对已知风险因素的评估。在主要移植年龄组(<50岁)的年轻成年人中,异体(allo)-SCT并非一概具有优势,但对于费城染色体阳性(Ph+)ALL或伴有t(4;11)的前B-ALL患者,以及可能对于B系ALL且初始白细胞计数>100,000/μL的患者,推荐进行allo-SCT。尚无证据表明allo-SCT能提高T细胞ALL等预后良好亚组仅通过化疗已达到的高治愈率。对于CRI期的高危或标准风险患者,自体(auto)-SCT在巩固治疗方面似乎并不优于化疗。关于早期使用auto-SCT可缩短治疗时间从而改善生活质量的观点缺乏说服力,因为维持化疗的发病率很低。接受现代强化多药化疗方案进行CRI治疗但随后复发的患者,仅靠额外化疗不太可能治愈。高度多药耐药迅速发展。这些患者应尽可能接受allo-SCT。不幸的是,由于缺乏供体、保险覆盖不足、存在合并症或年龄较大,只有少数此类患者能够进行allo-SCT。在这种情况下,使用替代供体(匹配的无关供体或部分人类白细胞抗原[HLA]匹配的家庭成员)是合适的。对于晚期ALL患者,无论是否采用先前的净化方法,auto-SCT均无效。