Mehta Shamir R, Granger Christopher B, Eikelboom John W, Bassand Jean-Pierre, Wallentin Lars, Faxon David P, Peters Ron J G, Budaj Andrzej, Afzal Rizwan, Chrolavicius Susan, Fox Keith A A, Yusuf Salim
Department of Medicine, McMaster University and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 30;50(18):1742-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.042. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
This study reports a prospectively planned analysis of patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the OASIS-5 (Fifth Organization to Assess Strategies in Ischemic Syndromes) trial.
In the OASIS-5 trial, fondaparinux was similar to enoxaparin for short-term efficacy, but reduced major bleeding by one-half and 30-day mortality by 17%.
The OASIS-5 trial was a double-blind, randomized comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in 20,078 patients with acute coronary syndrome. A total of 12,715 patients underwent heart catheterization during the initial hospitalization, and 6,238 patients underwent PCI. In the fondaparinux group, intravenous fondaparinux was given for PCI. In the enoxaparin group, no additional anticoagulant was given if PCI was <6 h from last subcutaneous dose, and additional intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) was given if PCI was >6 h.
Fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin reduced major bleeding by more than one-half (2.4% vs. 5.1%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, p < 0.00001) at day 9, with similar rates of ischemic events, resulting in superior net clinical benefit (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, major bleeding: 8.2% vs. 10.4%, HR 0.78, p = 0.004). Fondaparinux reduced major bleeding 48 h after PCI irrespective of whether PCI was performed <6 h of the last enoxaparin dose (1.6% vs. 3.8%, HR 0.42, p < 0.0001) or >6 h when UFH was given (1.3% vs. 3.4%, HR 0.39, p < 0.0001). Catheter thrombus was more common in patients receiving fondaparinux (0.9%) than enoxaparin alone (0.4%), but was largely prevented by using UFH at the time of PCI, without any increase in bleeding.
Upstream therapy with fondaparinux compared with upstream enoxaparin substantially reduces major bleeding while maintaining efficacy, resulting in superior net clinical benefit. The use of standard UFH in place of fondaparinux at the time of PCI seems to prevent angiographic complications, including catheter thrombus, without compromising the benefits of upstream fondaparinux.
本研究报告了在OASIS - 5(缺血综合征策略评估第五组织)试验中对接受早期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征患者进行的一项前瞻性计划分析。
在OASIS - 5试验中,磺达肝癸钠在短期疗效方面与依诺肝素相似,但大出血减少了一半,30天死亡率降低了17%。
OASIS - 5试验是一项对20,078例急性冠状动脉综合征患者进行的磺达肝癸钠和依诺肝素的双盲、随机对照研究。共有12,715例患者在初次住院期间接受了心导管检查,6,238例患者接受了PCI。在磺达肝癸钠组,PCI时给予静脉注射磺达肝癸钠。在依诺肝素组,如果PCI距离上次皮下注射剂量<6小时,则不给予额外的抗凝剂;如果PCI距离上次皮下注射剂量>6小时,则给予额外的静脉普通肝素(UFH)。
与依诺肝素相比,磺达肝癸钠在第9天时大出血减少了一半以上(2.4%对5.1%,风险比[HR]0.46,p<0.00001),缺血事件发生率相似,从而带来更好的净临床获益(死亡、心肌梗死、中风、大出血:8.2%对10.4%,HR 0.78,p = 0.004)。无论PCI是在最后一剂依诺肝素<6小时(1.6%对3.8%,HR 0.42,p<0.0001)还是>6小时且给予UFH时(1.3%对3.4%,HR 0.39,p<0.0001)进行,磺达肝癸钠均可减少PCI后48小时的大出血。接受磺达肝癸钠治疗的患者(0.9%)比单独接受依诺肝素治疗的患者(0.4%)导管血栓更常见,但在PCI时使用UFH可在很大程度上预防,且不增加出血。
与上游使用依诺肝素相比,上游使用磺达肝癸钠可在维持疗效的同时大幅减少大出血,从而带来更好的净临床获益。在PCI时使用标准UFH替代磺达肝癸钠似乎可预防包括导管血栓在内的血管造影并发症,而不影响上游使用磺达肝癸钠的益处。