• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠脉综合征出院后出血的发生率和预后影响:系统评价。

Incidence and prognostic impact of post discharge bleeding post acute coronary syndrome within an outpatient setting: a systematic review.

机构信息

Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Newcastle, UK.

The Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 20;9(2):e023337. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023337.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023337
PMID:30787079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6398751/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to determine the incidence of bleeding events post acute coronary syndrome (ACS) following hospital discharge. The secondary objective was to determine the prognostic impact of bleeding on mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial re-infarction and rehospitalisation in the postdischarge setting.

DESIGN

A narrative systematic review.

DATA SOURCE

Medline, Embase, Amed and Central (Cochrane) were searched up to August 2018.

STUDY SELECTION

For the primary objective, randomised controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies reporting on the incidence of bleeding post hospital discharge were included. For the secondary objective, RCTs and observational studies that compared patients with bleeding versus those without bleeding post hospital discharge vis-à-vis mortality, MACE, myocardial re-infarction and rehospitalisation were included.

RESULTS

53 studies (36 observational studies and 17 RCTs) with a combined cohort of 714 458 participants for the primary objectives and 187 317 for the secondary objectives were included. Follow-up ranged from 1 month to just over 4 years. The incidence of bleeding within 12 months post hospital discharge ranged from 0.20% to 37.5% in observational studies and between 0.96% and 39.4% in RCTs. The majority of bleeds occurred in the initial 3 months after hospital discharge with bruising the most commonly reported event. Major bleeding increased the risk of mortality by nearly threefold in two studies. One study showed an increased risk of MACE (HR 3.00,95% CI 2.75 to 3.27; p<0.0001) with bleeding and another study showed a non-significant association with rehospitalisation (HR 1.20,95% CI 0.95 to 1.52; p=0.13).

CONCLUSION

Bleeding complications following ACS management are common and continue to occur in the long term after hospital discharge. These bleeding complications may increase the risk of mortality and MACE, but greater evidence is needed to assess their long-term effects.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017062378.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是确定急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者出院后的出血事件发生率。次要目的是确定出血对出院后患者死亡率、主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、心肌再梗死和再住院的预后影响。

设计

叙述性系统评价。

资料来源

截至 2018 年 8 月,检索了 Medline、Embase、Amed 和中央(Cochrane)数据库。

研究选择

主要目的纳入了报告出院后出血发生率的随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究;次要目的纳入了比较出院后出血患者与非出血患者死亡率、MACE、心肌再梗死和再住院率的 RCT 和观察性研究。

结果

共纳入了 53 项研究(36 项观察性研究和 17 项 RCT),主要目的的综合队列包含了 714458 例患者,次要目的包含了 187317 例患者。随访时间从 1 个月到 4 年多不等。出院后 12 个月内出血的发生率在观察性研究中为 0.20%至 37.5%,在 RCT 中为 0.96%至 39.4%。大多数出血发生在出院后最初 3 个月内,最常见的报告事件为瘀伤。两项研究显示,大出血使死亡率增加近两倍。一项研究显示,出血与 MACE 风险增加相关(HR 3.00,95%CI 2.75 至 3.27;p<0.0001),另一项研究显示与再住院率无显著关联(HR 1.20,95%CI 0.95 至 1.52;p=0.13)。

结论

ACS 治疗后出血并发症很常见,且在出院后长期仍持续发生。这些出血并发症可能增加死亡率和 MACE 的风险,但需要更多证据来评估其长期影响。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42017062378。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da28/6398751/b840b5c984a2/bmjopen-2018-023337f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da28/6398751/bbc2e9929ce3/bmjopen-2018-023337f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da28/6398751/8190b50549b7/bmjopen-2018-023337f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da28/6398751/71a607a809dd/bmjopen-2018-023337f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da28/6398751/b840b5c984a2/bmjopen-2018-023337f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da28/6398751/bbc2e9929ce3/bmjopen-2018-023337f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da28/6398751/8190b50549b7/bmjopen-2018-023337f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da28/6398751/71a607a809dd/bmjopen-2018-023337f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da28/6398751/b840b5c984a2/bmjopen-2018-023337f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Incidence and prognostic impact of post discharge bleeding post acute coronary syndrome within an outpatient setting: a systematic review.急性冠脉综合征出院后出血的发生率和预后影响:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 20;9(2):e023337. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023337.
2
Bleeding After Hospital Discharge Following Acute Coronary Syndrome: Incidence, Types, Timing, and Predictors.急性冠状动脉综合征出院后出血:发生率、类型、时间和预测因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(21):e013679. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013679. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
3
Post-Discharge Bleeding and Mortality Following Acute Coronary Syndromes With or Without PCI.急性冠状动脉综合征伴或不伴经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者出院后出血和死亡率。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 14;76(2):162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.031.
4
A risk score to predict postdischarge bleeding among acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: BRIC-ACS study.BRIC-ACS 研究:一种预测行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者出院后出血风险的评分。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 1;93(7):1194-1204. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28325. Epub 2019 May 21.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Prognostic significance of bleeding location and severity among patients with acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者出血部位和严重程度的预后意义。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul;6(7):709-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.03.010.
7
Differential Prognostic Impact on Mortality of Myocardial Infarction Compared With Bleeding Severity in Contemporary Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.当代急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,心肌梗死与出血严重程度对死亡率的预后影响差异
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018 Oct;71(10):829-836. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
8
Antithrombotic treatment after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage.脑出血所致脑卒中后的抗血栓治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 26;1(1):CD012144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012144.pub3.
9
Morphine in acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征中的吗啡:系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 15;9(3):e025232. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025232.
10
De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的降阶梯治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):171-186. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112476.

引用本文的文献

1
Decoding Bleeding Risks and Survival in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Antiplatelet Therapy.解读接受抗血小板治疗的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的出血风险和生存率
JACC Asia. 2025 Sep;5(9):1083-1094. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.05.017. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
2
Antiplatelet Therapy in Heart Disease.心脏病中的抗血小板治疗
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 25;26(6):36522. doi: 10.31083/RCM36522. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Post-discharge major bleeding/all-cause death in acute coronary syndrome: academic research consortium criteria versus Japan-specific criteria.

本文引用的文献

1
Usefulness of the PARIS Score to Evaluate the Ischemic-hemorrhagic Net Benefit With Ticagrelor and Prasugrel After an Acute Coronary Syndrome.PARIS评分对评估急性冠脉综合征后替格瑞洛和普拉格雷的缺血-出血净获益的有用性。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019 Mar;72(3):215-223. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
2
One-year efficacy and safety of routine prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the prospective rijnmond collective cardiology research study.急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后常规使用普拉格雷的一年疗效及安全性:前瞻性里蒙德集体心脏病学研究结果
Neth Heart J. 2018 Aug;26(7-8):393-400. doi: 10.1007/s12471-018-1126-0.
3
急性冠状动脉综合征出院后大出血/全因死亡:学术研究联盟标准与日本特定标准对比
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 May 15;25(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04834-1.
4
Association of Prognostic Nutritional Index with Post-Discharge Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ACS Patients on DAPT.急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者接受双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)后,预后营养指数与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后出院后出血的相关性。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 Apr 10;21:455-466. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S496656. eCollection 2025.
5
Cost-effectiveness of implementing a genotype-guided de-escalation strategy in patients with acute coronary syndrome.在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中实施基因导向的降阶梯治疗策略的成本效益
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025 May 2;11(3):230-240. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae087.
6
Transfusion and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的输血和临床结局。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 9;14(1):18461. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69385-5.
7
Impact of Coexisting Risk Factors on Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Real-World Analysis Using the Taiwan Chang Gung Research Database.共存风险因素对急性冠状动脉综合征患者结局的影响:利用台湾长庚研究数据库进行的真实世界分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Aug 4;29:e941258. doi: 10.12659/MSM.941258.
8
Impact of recurrent ischaemic and bleeding events on quality of life in patients with acute coronary syndrome: Insights from the FORCE-ACS registry.反复发生的缺血和出血事件对急性冠状动脉综合征患者生活质量的影响:FORCE-ACS 注册研究的结果。
Open Heart. 2023 Aug;10(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002405.
9
De-escalation or abbreviation of dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: a Consensus Statement from an international expert panel on coronary thrombosis.急性冠状动脉综合征和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中双联抗血小板治疗的降级或缩短:来自冠状动脉血栓形成国际专家小组的共识声明。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Dec;20(12):830-844. doi: 10.1038/s41569-023-00901-2. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
10
Single antiplatelet therapy directly after percutaneous coronary intervention in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: the OPTICA study.非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后直接应用单药抗血小板治疗:OPTICA 研究。
EuroIntervention. 2023 May 15;19(1):63-72. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00886.
Long-term follow-up of antithrombotic management patterns in acute coronary syndrome patients.
急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血栓治疗管理模式的长期随访
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2018 Apr;46(3):175-183. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2017.66724.
4
Differential Prognostic Impact on Mortality of Myocardial Infarction Compared With Bleeding Severity in Contemporary Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.当代急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,心肌梗死与出血严重程度对死亡率的预后影响差异
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018 Oct;71(10):829-836. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
5
Prediction of Post-Discharge Bleeding in Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights from the BleeMACS Registry.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者出院后出血的预测:来自 BleeMACS 登记研究的启示。
Thromb Haemost. 2018 May;118(5):929-938. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1635259. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
6
Development and external validation of a post-discharge bleeding risk score in patients with acute coronary syndrome: The BleeMACS score.急性冠状动脉综合征患者出院后出血风险评分的制定与外部验证:BleeMACS 评分。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 1;254:10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.103. Epub 2018 Jan 28.
7
One-Year Clinical Effectiveness Comparison of Prasugrel with Ticagrelor: Results from a Retrospective Observational Study using an Integrated Claims Database.一项使用整合理赔数据库的回顾性观察研究:替格瑞洛与普拉格雷一年临床疗效比较结果。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2018 Apr;18(2):129-141. doi: 10.1007/s40256-017-0255-y.
8
Incidence and Prognostic Implications of Late Bleeding After Myocardial Infarction or Unstable Angina According to Treatment Strategy.根据治疗策略探讨心肌梗死或不稳定型心绞痛后迟发性出血的发生率及预后影响
Can J Cardiol. 2017 Aug;33(8):998-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 5.
9
Benefit of switching dual antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome: the TOPIC (timing of platelet inhibition after acute coronary syndrome) randomized study.急性冠脉综合征后转换双联抗血小板治疗的获益:TOPIC(急性冠脉综合征后血小板抑制的时机)随机研究。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Nov 1;38(41):3070-3078. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx175.
10
Predicting the risk of bleeding during dual antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndromes.预测急性冠脉综合征后双联抗血小板治疗期间的出血风险。
Heart. 2017 Aug;103(15):1168-1176. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310090. Epub 2017 Apr 5.