Suppr超能文献

价格是否会成为低收入家庭增加水果和蔬菜摄入量的障碍?

Is price a barrier to eating more fruits and vegetables for low-income families?

作者信息

Cassady Diana, Jetter Karen M, Culp Jennifer

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 9561, USA.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Nov;107(11):1909-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.08.015. Epub 2007 Oct 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if price is a barrier to fruit and vegetable consumption for low-income families by comparing the average cost of a market basket of fruits and vegetables from the Thrifty Food Plan and the Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005 (2005 Dietary Guidelines), investigating variations in price by neighborhood income and by type of supermarket, and estimating the influence of a 2005 Dietary Guidelines fruit and vegetable basket on the food budget of a low-income family.

DESIGN

A market basket survey was conducted at 25 supermarkets across three time periods to allow for seasonal variation in produce prices.

SETTING

Stores were selected from census tracts with a variety of income levels in Sacramento, CA, and Los Angeles, CA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The average cost of a Thrifty Food Plan and 2005 Dietary Guidelines market basket for fruits and vegetables.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED

Student t tests were used to compare the mean cost of market baskets.

RESULTS

The 2005 Dietary Guidelines market basket cost 4% less than the Thrifty Food Plan (P<0.001), and was significantly less expensive in low-income areas at 65 dollars (P<0.05), and in bulk supermarkets at 59 dollars (P<0.05). The 2005 Dietary Guidelines market basket would require a low-income family to devote 43% to 70% of their food budget to fruits and vegetables.

CONCLUSIONS

Public policies should examine ways to make fruits and vegetables more affordable to low-income families.

摘要

目的

通过比较节俭食物计划中的一篮子水果和蔬菜的平均成本与《2005年美国膳食指南》(《2005年膳食指南》),调查不同社区收入和超市类型的价格差异,并估计《2005年膳食指南》中的水果和蔬菜篮子对低收入家庭食品预算的影响,以确定价格是否是低收入家庭消费水果和蔬菜的障碍。

设计

在三个时间段内对25家超市进行了一篮子商品调查,以考虑农产品价格的季节性变化。

地点

从加利福尼亚州萨克拉门托市和加利福尼亚州洛杉矶市不同收入水平的普查区中选取商店。

主要观察指标

节俭食物计划和《2005年膳食指南》中水果和蔬菜一篮子商品的平均成本。

进行的统计分析

采用学生t检验比较一篮子商品的平均成本。

结果

《2005年膳食指南》中的一篮子商品成本比节俭食物计划低4%(P<0.001),在低收入地区为65美元,成本显著较低(P<0.05),在量贩超市为59美元,成本也显著较低(P<0.05)。《2005年膳食指南》中的一篮子商品将要求低收入家庭将其食品预算的43%至70%用于水果和蔬菜。

结论

公共政策应研究如何使低收入家庭更能负担得起水果和蔬菜。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验