Craeynest Mietje, Crombez Geert, Koster Ernst H W, Haerens Leen, De Bourdeaudhuij Ilse
Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;39(3):354-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2007.09.002. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
Cognitive-motivational accounts of fat food intake propose an association between fat food and action dispositions, which are according to the biphasic emotion theory of Lang [(1995). The emotion probe. Studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist, 50, 372-385; Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., & Cuthbert, M.M. (1997). Motivated attention: Affect, activation and action. In P.J. Lang, R.F. Simons & M.T. Balaban (Eds.). Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes (pp. 97-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.] characterized by high levels of arousal. In two experiments, this association was investigated in lean and overweight youngsters. In the first experiment, 29 overweight and 29 lean youngsters conducted two Implicit Association Tasks (IAT; Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, J.L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.). In a positive arousal IAT, implicit associations between fat vs. lean food, and high and low arousal words with a positive valence were assessed. In a negative arousal IAT, high and low arousal words with a negative valence were used. A second experiment was conducted to replicate Experiment 1 in 29 youngsters with severe obesity and 29 lean peers. The results revealed strong implicit associations between fat food and arousal in both the overweight and the control group. No differences were found between the groups, nor between the positive and the negative arousal task. These results are related to cognitive-motivational theories of fat food intake.
关于高脂肪食物摄入的认知动机理论认为,高脂肪食物与行动倾向之间存在关联,根据朗格的双相情感理论[(1995年)。情感探针。动机与注意力研究。《美国心理学家》,50,372 - 385;朗格,P.J.,布拉德利,M.M.,& 卡斯伯特,M.M.(1997年)。动机性注意力:情感、激活与行动。载于P.J. 朗格、R.F. 西蒙斯 & M.T. 巴拉班(编)。注意力与定向:感觉与动机过程(第97 - 134页)。新泽西州希尔斯代尔:劳伦斯·埃尔鲍姆联合出版公司],这种关联的特点是高度唤醒。在两项实验中,对瘦的和超重的青少年进行了这种关联的研究。在第一个实验中,29名超重青少年和29名瘦青少年进行了两项内隐联想测验(IAT;格林沃尔德,A.G.,麦吉,D.E.,& 施瓦茨,J.L.(1998年)。测量内隐认知的个体差异:内隐联想测验。《人格与社会心理学杂志》,74,1464 - 1480)。在一个积极唤醒的IAT中,评估了高脂肪与低脂肪食物以及具有正性效价的高唤醒和低唤醒词汇之间的内隐联想。在一个消极唤醒的IAT中,使用了具有负性效价的高唤醒和低唤醒词汇。进行了第二个实验,以在29名严重肥胖青少年和29名瘦的同龄人中重复实验1。结果显示,超重组和对照组中高脂肪食物与唤醒之间都存在强烈的内隐联想。在两组之间以及积极和消极唤醒任务之间均未发现差异。这些结果与高脂肪食物摄入的认知动机理论相关。