Saksena Sanjeev, Hettrick Douglas A, Koehler Jodi L, Grammatico Andrea, Padeletti Luigi
Electrophysiology Research Foundation, Warren, NJ 07059, USA.
Am Heart J. 2007 Nov;154(5):884-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.06.045. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
The experimental concept that "atrial fibrillation (AF) begets AF" implies that atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT)/AF burden uniformly increases over time. However, the temporal patterns of paroxysmal AT/AF burden progression, its conversion to persistent AF, and the relationship to underlying disease in humans are unknown. We analyzed the average daily AT/AF burden in patients with concomitant bradycardia and paroxysmal AF to examine these issues.
Three hundred thirty patients with a history of paroxysmal AF (mean age 70 +/- 10 years; 61% male) were implanted with a pacemaker that automatically recorded the cumulative daily AT/AF burden. Persistent AT/AF was defined as 7 consecutive days with >23 hours of AT on the device data logs. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy was required to be stable for at least 7 months.
Average follow-up was 401 +/- 123 days. Seventy-eight patients (24%) progressed to persistent AT/AF during the follow-up period with a mean interval of 147 +/- 149 days. Mean AT/AF burden increased progressively (slope 14 s/d, P < .001) over 500 days after implant, and median AT/AF burden also increased (P < .01) in this subgroup of patients. This increase was highly correlated with the presence of structural heart disease (P < .001). There was a concomitant decrease in atrial premature beat (APB) frequency. Most patients transitioning to persistent AF were in sinus rhythm with minimal AT/AF burden in the days immediately before persistent AF. Neither mean nor median AT/AF burden increased over time in patients remaining in paroxysmal AF (slope 0 s/d, P = .7) despite a higher APB frequency than in patients with heart disease (P =.003) and a higher likelihood of daily AT/AF events (P < .001).
Temporal patterns of AT/AF burden in patients developing persistent AF show a progressive increase with a sudden transition to persistent AF. This is more consistent with substrate changes, rather than increased density of triggering APBs or paroxysmal AT/AF events. Thus, progression to persistent AF is probably related to an AF substrate, which is undergoing progressive structural remodeling owing to heart disease and other factors and is now suddenly capable of sustaining prolonged or multiple ATs. Therapies directed at the atrial substrate may be needed to prevent persistent AF.
“房颤引发房颤”这一实验概念意味着房性快速心律失常(AT)/房颤负荷会随时间持续增加。然而,阵发性AT/房颤负荷进展的时间模式、其转变为持续性房颤的情况以及与人类潜在疾病的关系尚不清楚。我们分析了合并心动过缓和阵发性房颤患者的平均每日AT/房颤负荷,以探讨这些问题。
330例有阵发性房颤病史的患者(平均年龄70±10岁;61%为男性)植入了可自动记录每日累积AT/房颤负荷的起搏器。持续性AT/房颤定义为设备数据日志显示连续7天AT时间超过23小时。抗心律失常药物治疗需稳定至少7个月。
平均随访时间为401±123天。78例患者(24%)在随访期间进展为持续性AT/房颤,平均间隔为147±149天。植入后500天内,平均AT/房颤负荷逐渐增加(斜率为14秒/天,P<.001),该亚组患者的中位AT/房颤负荷也增加了(P<.01)。这种增加与结构性心脏病的存在高度相关(P<.001)。房性早搏(APB)频率随之下降。大多数转变为持续性房颤的患者在持续性房颤前几天处于窦性心律,AT/房颤负荷最小。仍为阵发性房颤的患者,其平均和中位AT/房颤负荷均未随时间增加(斜率为0秒/天,P=.7),尽管其APB频率高于有心脏病的患者(P=.003),且每日发生AT/房颤事件的可能性更高(P<.001)。
进展为持续性房颤的患者,其AT/房颤负荷的时间模式显示出逐渐增加,并突然转变为持续性房颤。这更符合基质变化,而非触发APB或阵发性AT/房颤事件密度增加。因此,进展为持续性房颤可能与房颤基质有关,由于心脏病和其他因素,该基质正在进行渐进性结构重塑,现在突然能够维持长时间或多次AT。可能需要针对心房基质的治疗来预防持续性房颤。