Thomas Eva S, Gomez Henry L, Li Rubi K, Chung Hyun-Cheol, Fein Luis E, Chan Valorie F, Jassem Jacek, Pivot Xavier B, Klimovsky Judith V, de Mendoza Fernando Hurtado, Xu Binghe, Campone Mario, Lerzo Guillermo L, Peck Ronald A, Mukhopadhyay Pralay, Vahdat Linda T, Roché Henri H
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 20;25(33):5210-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.6557. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
Effective treatment options for patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes are limited. Ixabepilone has single-agent activity in these patients and has demonstrated synergy with capecitabine in this setting. This study was designed to compare ixabepilone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in anthracycline-pretreated or -resistant and taxane-resistant locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
Seven hundred fifty-two patients were randomly assigned to ixabepilone 40 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m(2) orally on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle, or capecitabine alone 2,500 mg/m(2) on the same schedule, in this international phase III study. The primary end point was progression-free survival evaluated by blinded independent review.
Ixabepilone plus capecitabine prolonged progression-free survival relative to capecitabine (median, 5.8 v 4.2 months), with a 25% reduction in the estimated risk of disease progression (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.88; P = .0003). Objective response rate was also increased (35% v 14%; P < .0001). Grade 3/4 treatment-related sensory neuropathy (21% v 0%), fatigue (9% v 3%), and neutropenia (68% v 11%) were more frequent with combination therapy, as was the rate of death as a result of toxicity (3% v 1%, with patients with liver dysfunction [>/= grade 2 liver function tests] at greater risk). Capecitabine-related toxicities were similar for both treatment groups.
Ixabepilone plus capecitabine demonstrates superior efficacy to capecitabine alone in patients with metastatic breast cancer pretreated or resistant to anthracyclines and resistant to taxanes.
对于对蒽环类药物和紫杉烷类耐药的转移性乳腺癌患者,有效的治疗选择有限。伊沙匹隆在这些患者中具有单药活性,并且在这种情况下已证明与卡培他滨具有协同作用。本研究旨在比较伊沙匹隆加卡培他滨与单独使用卡培他滨治疗蒽环类药物预处理或耐药且紫杉烷类耐药的局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌的疗效。
在这项国际III期研究中,752例患者被随机分配接受在21天周期的第1天静脉注射伊沙匹隆40mg/m²,同时在21天周期的第1天至第14天口服卡培他滨2000mg/m²,或按相同方案单独口服卡培他滨2500mg/m²。主要终点是通过盲法独立审查评估的无进展生存期。
与卡培他滨相比,伊沙匹隆加卡培他滨延长了无进展生存期(中位数分别为5.8个月和4.2个月),疾病进展的估计风险降低了25%(风险比为0.75;95%可信区间为0.64至0.88;P = 0.0003)。客观缓解率也有所提高(35%对14%;P < 0.0001)。联合治疗组3/4级治疗相关感觉神经病变(21%对0%)、疲劳(9%对3%)和中性粒细胞减少(68%对11%)更为常见,因毒性导致的死亡率也是如此(3%对1%,肝功能障碍[肝功能检查≥2级]的患者风险更高)。两个治疗组中与卡培他滨相关的毒性相似。
在对蒽环类药物预处理或耐药且对紫杉烷类耐药的转移性乳腺癌患者中,伊沙匹隆加卡培他滨的疗效优于单独使用卡培他滨。