Suppr超能文献

通过时空图像相关技术的四维超声与二维及多普勒超声测定胎儿心搏量的比较

Fetal cardiac stroke volume determination by four-dimensional ultrasound with spatio-temporal image correlation compared with two-dimensional and Doppler ultrasonography.

作者信息

Rizzo Giuseppe, Capponi Alessandra, Cavicchioni Ottavia, Vendola Marianne, Arduini Domenico

机构信息

Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università di Roma "Tor Vergata", Italy.

出版信息

Prenat Diagn. 2007 Dec;27(12):1147-50. doi: 10.1002/pd.1870.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the agreement of stroke volume (SV) measured with two-dimensional (2D) ultrasonography with Doppler capability (vs) four-dimensional (4D) with spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) in normal and growth restricted fetuses.

METHODS

2D Doppler and 4D STIC were used to measure SV of 40 normal fetuses at 20 to 22 and 28 to 32 weeks, and 16 growth-restricted fetuses at 26 to 34 weeks of gestation. Intraclass correlation was used to evaluate the agreement between left and right SV obtained by the two techniques, and proportionate Bland-Altman plots constructed. The time necessary to obtain SV was analyzed.

RESULTS

The intraclass correlation coefficient between 2D Doppler and 4D STIC measurements for the left ventricle were 0.977 and 0.980 for the right ventricle. The proportionate limits of agreement between the two methods were 18.7 to 23.9% for the left ventricle and - 20.9 to 21.7% for the right ventricle. The time necessary to measure SV was significantly shorter with 4D STIC (3.1 (vs) 7.9 min p < 0.0001) than with 2D Doppler.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a good agreement between SV measured either by 2D Doppler or by 4D STIC. The 4D STIC represents a simple and rapid technique to estimate fetal SV and promises to become the method of choice.

摘要

目的

评估二维(2D)多普勒超声测量的每搏输出量(SV)与四维(4D)时空图像相关(STIC)技术在正常胎儿和生长受限胎儿中的一致性。

方法

采用2D多普勒和4D STIC技术测量40例孕20至22周和28至32周的正常胎儿以及16例孕26至34周的生长受限胎儿的SV。采用组内相关系数评估两种技术测得的左右SV之间的一致性,并绘制比例Bland-Altman图。分析获取SV所需的时间。

结果

左心室2D多普勒与4D STIC测量的组内相关系数为0.977,右心室为0.980。两种方法的一致性比例界限,左心室为18.7%至23.9%,右心室为-20.9%至21.7%。4D STIC测量SV所需的时间(3.1分钟,而2D多普勒为7.9分钟,p<0.0001)明显短于2D多普勒。

结论

2D多普勒或4D STIC测量的SV之间具有良好的一致性。4D STIC是一种简单快速的评估胎儿SV的技术,有望成为首选方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验