Tanimoto Shuzou, Daemen Joost, Serruys Patrick W
Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam,The Netherlands.
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3(4):481-90.
Small vessel size (<3 mm) has been identified as an independent predictive factor of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention when using bare metal stents (BMS). It remains controversial whether BMS placement in small vessels has an advantage over balloon angioplasty in terms of angiographic and clinical outcomes. The advent of drug eluting stents (DES), either paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) or sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), has strongly impacted interventional cardiology by significantly reducing restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization. Therefore, it was also expected that DES could substantially reduce restenosis in smaller vessels. However, even in the DES era, small vessel size remains an independent predictor of angiographic and clinical restenosis. To date, only a few studies systematically investigate the clinical effect of DES placement in small vessels. In addition, some potential issues with the use of DES have been raised, such as late stent thrombosis and late restenosis. In order to (i) establish the superiority of DES over BMS; (ii) verify the efficacy and safety of DES; and (iii) critically assess the superiority of one DES over the other in patients with small coronary arteries, further multicenter, randomized clinical trials with larger sample size are warranted.
当使用裸金属支架(BMS)进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时,小血管尺寸(<3毫米)已被确定为再狭窄的独立预测因素。就血管造影和临床结果而言,在小血管中放置BMS是否优于球囊血管成形术仍存在争议。药物洗脱支架(DES)的出现,无论是紫杉醇洗脱支架(PES)还是西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES),都通过显著降低再狭窄和重复血管重建的需求,对介入心脏病学产生了重大影响。因此,人们也期望DES能大幅降低小血管中的再狭窄。然而,即使在DES时代,小血管尺寸仍然是血管造影和临床再狭窄的独立预测因素。迄今为止,只有少数研究系统地调查了在小血管中放置DES的临床效果。此外,使用DES还引发了一些潜在问题,如晚期支架血栓形成和晚期再狭窄。为了(i)确立DES优于BMS;(ii)验证DES的疗效和安全性;以及(iii)严格评估一种DES相对于另一种DES在小冠状动脉患者中的优势,有必要进行进一步的多中心、大样本量随机临床试验。