Suppr超能文献

一种改良的带护套和骨水泥新型椎弓根螺钉的比较生物力学分析

Comparative biomechanical analysis of an improved novel pedicle screw with sheath and bone cement.

作者信息

Takigawa Tomoyuki, Tanaka Masato, Konishi Hitoshi, Ikuma Hisanori, Misawa Haruo, Sugimoto Yoshihisa, Nakanishi Kazuo, Kuramoto Koichi, Nishida Keiichiro, Ozaki Toshifumi

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Japan.

出版信息

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Aug;20(6):462-7. doi: 10.1097/bsd.0b013e318030d2d6.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A human cadaveric biomechanical study of fixation strength of an improved novel pedicle screw (NPS) with cement and a conventional screw.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify whether the NPS has adequate fixation strength without leakage in vertebrae with low bone quality.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The fixation strength of pedicle screws decreases in frail spines of elderly osteoporotic patients. Augmentation of screw fixation with bone cement must be balanced against increased difficulty of screw removal and risk of cement leakage. We developed the NPS consisting of an internal screw and an outer sheath to mitigate the disadvantages of cement augmentation.

METHODS

The T12 and L1 vertebrae obtained from 18 formalin preserved cadavers (11 males and 7 females; mean age, 82.7 y) were used. The mean bone mineral density was 0.39 +/- 0.14 g/cm2. The NPS was inserted into one pedicle of each vertebra and the control screw, a Compact CD2 screw, was inserted into the contralateral pedicle. Both screws were 6mm in diameter and 40 mm in length. Pull-out tests were performed at a crosshead speed of 10 mm/min. Cyclic loading tests were performed with a maximum 250 N load at 2 Hz until 30,000 cycles.

RESULTS

Cement leakage did not occur in any of the specimens tested. The mean maximum force at pull-out was 760 +/- 344 N for the NPS and 346 +/- 172N for the control screw (P < 0.01). Loosening of 50% of the screws was observed after 17,000 cycles of the NPS and after 30 cycles of the control screw. The hazard ratio of loosening was 19.6 (95% confidence interval 19.3-19.9) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The NPS showed a significantly higher mechanical strength than the control screw in both pull-out tests and cyclic loading tests. The NPS showed more than adequate strength without cement leakage.

摘要

研究设计

一项关于改良新型椎弓根螺钉(NPS)与传统螺钉联合骨水泥固定强度的人体尸体生物力学研究。

目的

明确在低骨质量椎体中,NPS是否具有足够的固定强度且无渗漏。

背景数据总结

在老年骨质疏松患者的脆弱脊柱中,椎弓根螺钉的固定强度会降低。用骨水泥增强螺钉固定必须在增加螺钉取出难度和骨水泥渗漏风险之间取得平衡。我们开发了由内螺钉和外鞘组成的NPS,以减轻骨水泥增强的缺点。

方法

使用从18具用福尔马林保存的尸体(11例男性和7例女性;平均年龄82.7岁)获取的T12和L1椎体。平均骨密度为0.39±0.14g/cm²。将NPS插入每个椎体的一个椎弓根,将对照螺钉(Compact CD2螺钉)插入对侧椎弓根。两种螺钉直径均为6mm,长度均为40mm。以10mm/min的十字头速度进行拔出试验。以2Hz的频率施加最大250N的载荷进行循环加载试验,直至30000次循环。

结果

在所有测试标本中均未发生骨水泥渗漏。NPS拔出时的平均最大力为760±344N,对照螺钉为346±172N(P<0.01)。在NPS进行17000次循环后以及对照螺钉进行30次循环后,观察到50%的螺钉出现松动。松动的风险比为19.6(95%置信区间19.3 - 19.9)(P<0.001)。

结论

在拔出试验和循环加载试验中,NPS的机械强度均显著高于对照螺钉。NPS显示出足够的强度且无骨水泥渗漏。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验