A persistent problem. Traditional gender roles hold back female scientists.
作者信息
Ledin Anna, Bornmann Lutz, Gannon Frank, Wallon Gerlind
机构信息
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
出版信息
EMBO Rep. 2007 Nov;8(11):982-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401109.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
A persistent problem. Traditional gender roles hold back female scientists.一个长期存在的问题。传统的性别角色阻碍了女性科学家的发展。
EMBO Rep. 2007 Nov;8(11):982-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401109.
2
The women issue.女性问题。
EMBO Rep. 2007 Nov;8(11):975. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401100.
3
Falling off the academic bandwagon. Women are more likely to quit at the postdoc to principal investigator transition.跟不上学术潮流。女性在从博士后向首席研究员过渡阶段更有可能退出。
EMBO Rep. 2007 Nov;8(11):977-81. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401110.
4
Scholarship in nursing: what really counts?护理领域的学术成就：真正重要的是什么？
Nurse Res. 2006;13(4):79-80.
5
Rivalry and red tape.竞争与繁文缛节。
Nature. 2005 Jul 28;436(7050):490-1. doi: 10.1038/436490a.
6
Up for review.待审核。
Nature. 2004 Jul 29;430(6999):591. doi: 10.1038/nj6999-591a.
7
Searching for discrimination. Are women treated fairly in the EMBO postdoctoral fellowship scheme?寻找歧视现象。在欧洲分子生物学组织博士后奖学金计划中，女性是否受到公平对待？
EMBO Rep. 2001 Aug;2(8):655-7. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kve170.
8
Comment on "gender differences in research grant applications and funding outcomes for medical school faculty".对“医学院教员研究基金申请与资助结果中的性别差异”的评论
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Mar;17(2):303-4. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0755.
9
Equality: The fight for access.平等：争取获取机会的斗争。
Nature. 2011 Jan 13;469(7329):255-7. doi: 10.1038/nj7329-255a.
10
Nepotism and sexism in peer-review.同行评审中的裙带关系和性别歧视。
Nature. 1997 May 22;387(6631):341-3. doi: 10.1038/387341a0.
引用本文的文献
1
Do Manuscripts by Female Evolutionary Biologists Spend Longer Under Review?女性进化生物学家撰写的手稿审稿时间会更长吗？
Mol Biol Evol. 2025 Mar 5;42(3). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaf054.
2
Stochastic modelling of intersectional pay gaps in universities.大学交叉薪酬差距的随机建模。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Oct 11;10(10):230615. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230615. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.同行评审的资助申请、奖励及金额方面的性别差异：一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023 May 3;8(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00127-3.
4
Gender bias in academic medicine: a resumé study.学术医学中的性别偏见：一项简历研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 1;23(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04192-6.
5
Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration.探索学术科学六个关键领域的性别偏见：对抗性合作。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2023 Jul;24(1):15-73. doi: 10.1177/15291006231163179. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
6
The Associations between Childhood Experiences and Occupational Choice Capability, and the Mediation of Societal Gender Roles.童年经历与职业选择能力之间的关联以及社会性别角色的中介作用
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 29;10(6):1004. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061004.
7
An experimental test of the effects of redacting grant applicant identifiers on peer review outcomes.编辑申请人标识符对同行评审结果影响的实验测试。
Elife. 2021 Oct 19;10:e71368. doi: 10.7554/eLife.71368.
8
Initial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on time Japanese nursing faculty devote to research: Cross-sectional survey.COVID-19 大流行对日本护理教师投入研究时间的初步影响：横断面调查。
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2022 Jan;19(1):e12454. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12454. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
9
The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions.研究资助同行评审和资金决策中的漏洞管道：挑战与未来方向。
High Educ (Dordr). 2021;82(1):145-162. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00626-y. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
10
Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions.《科学、技术、工程和数学领域中的性别问题：问题、原因、解决方案》
J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 11;39(37):7228-7243. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0475-18.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
本文引用的文献
1
Searching for discrimination. Are women treated fairly in the EMBO postdoctoral fellowship scheme?寻找歧视现象。在欧洲分子生物学组织博士后奖学金计划中，女性是否受到公平对待？
EMBO Rep. 2001 Aug;2(8):655-7. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kve170.
Zotero 插件