• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

克林霉素和甲硝唑对脆弱拟杆菌群中对头孢西丁敏感及耐药菌株的杀菌活性比较。

Comparison of the bactericidal activity of clindamycin and metronidazole against cefoxitin-susceptible and cefoxitin-resistant isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

作者信息

Stratton C W, Weeks L S, Aldridge K E

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Sep-Oct;14(5):377-82. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(91)90064-m.

DOI:10.1016/0732-8893(91)90064-m
PMID:1797454
Abstract

Time-kill kinetic methodology was used to evaluate the bactericidal activity of cefoxitin, cefotetan, clindamycin, and metronidizole against cefoxitin-susceptible and cefoxitin-resistant isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group. Overall, metronidazole was the most bactericidal agent, with all isolates being killed with less than or equal to 4 micrograms/ml at 24 hr. Clindamycin was the next most bactericidal agent, with 20 of 26 isolates being killed with less than 16 micrograms/ml. Six isolates with clindamycin MICs greater than or equal to 64 micrograms/ml were not killed at 24 hr, with concentrations as high as 256 micrograms/ml. Cefoxitin and cefotetan were the least bactericidal agents tested. Seven isolates with MICs of greater than or equal to 64 micrograms/ml to each agent demonstrated a lack of killing at 24 hr, with concentrations of the respective agent as high as 256 micrograms/ml. At concentrations with either agent of 32 micrograms/ml, the remaining 19 isolates were killed at 24 hr. Of the six B. fragilis isolates resistant to clindamycin, four were also resistant to both cefoxitin and cefotetan. We conclude that in hospitals with cefoxitin-resistant B. fragilis group isolates, metronidazole would provide appropriate therapy.

摘要

采用时间-杀菌动力学方法评估头孢西丁、头孢替坦、克林霉素和甲硝唑对脆弱拟杆菌群中对头孢西丁敏感及耐药菌株的杀菌活性。总体而言,甲硝唑是最具杀菌活性的药物,所有菌株在24小时时用小于或等于4微克/毫升的浓度即可被杀灭。克林霉素是其次具杀菌活性的药物,26株菌株中有20株在浓度小于16微克/毫升时被杀灭。6株对克林霉素的最低抑菌浓度大于或等于64微克/毫升的菌株在24小时时未被杀灭,即便浓度高达256微克/毫升。头孢西丁和头孢替坦是所测试的杀菌活性最低的药物。7株对每种药物的最低抑菌浓度大于或等于64微克/毫升的菌株在24小时时未显示出被杀灭,即便各自药物的浓度高达256微克/毫升。在浓度为32微克/毫升的任何一种药物作用下,其余19株菌株在24小时时被杀灭。在6株对克林霉素耐药的脆弱拟杆菌菌株中,有4株同时对头孢西丁和头孢替坦耐药。我们得出结论,在存在对头孢西丁耐药的脆弱拟杆菌群菌株的医院中,甲硝唑可提供合适的治疗。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the bactericidal activity of clindamycin and metronidazole against cefoxitin-susceptible and cefoxitin-resistant isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.克林霉素和甲硝唑对脆弱拟杆菌群中对头孢西丁敏感及耐药菌株的杀菌活性比较。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Sep-Oct;14(5):377-82. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(91)90064-m.
2
Inhibitory and bactericidal activity of selected beta-lactam agents alone and in combination with beta-lactamase inhibitors compared with that of cefoxitin and metronidazole against cefoxitin-susceptible and cefoxitin-resistant isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.与头孢西丁和甲硝唑相比,所选β-内酰胺类药物单独及与β-内酰胺酶抑制剂联合使用时,对脆弱拟杆菌群中头孢西丁敏感和耐药菌株的抑制及杀菌活性。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 May-Jun;15(4):321-30. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(92)90018-o.
3
Differences in the in vitro inhibitory and bactericidal activity of ceftizoxime, cefoxitin, cefotetan, and penicillin G against Bacteroides fragilis group isolates. Comparison of time-kill kinetic studies with MIC values.头孢唑肟、头孢西丁、头孢替坦和青霉素G对脆弱拟杆菌属分离株的体外抑菌和杀菌活性差异。时间杀菌动力学研究与最低抑菌浓度值的比较。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 Jul-Aug;13(4):311-6. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(90)90023-o.
4
Bactericidal activity of ceftizoxime, cefotetan, and clindamycin against cefoxitin-resistant strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group.头孢唑肟、头孢替坦和克林霉素对脆弱拟杆菌群耐头孢西丁菌株的杀菌活性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Nov;28(5):701-5. doi: 10.1093/jac/28.5.701.
5
Annual incidence, epidemiology, and comparative in vitro susceptibilities to cefoxitin, cefotetan, cefmetazole, and ceftizoxime of recent community-acquired isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.脆弱拟杆菌群近期社区获得性分离株的年发病率、流行病学以及对头孢西丁、头孢替坦、头孢美唑和头孢唑肟的体外敏感性比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Nov;26(11):2361-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.11.2361-2366.1988.
6
In-vitro study of the susceptibility of cefoxitin/cefotetan resistant Bacteroides fragilis group strains to various other antimicrobial agents.对头孢西丁/头孢替坦耐药的脆弱拟杆菌群菌株对各种其他抗菌剂敏感性的体外研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Sep;26(3):353-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/26.3.353.
7
High incidence of cefoxitin and clindamycin resistance among anaerobes in Taiwan.台湾厌氧菌中头孢西丁和克林霉素耐药性的高发生率。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Sep;46(9):2908-13. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.9.2908-2913.2002.
8
Longitudinal study of susceptibilities of species of the Bacteroides fragilis group to five antimicrobial agents in three medical centers.在三个医学中心对脆弱拟杆菌群的物种对五种抗菌药物的敏感性进行的纵向研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Oct;38(10):2276-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.10.2276.
9
Bacteroides fragilis resistant to metronidazole, clindamycin and cefoxitin.脆弱拟杆菌对甲硝唑、克林霉素和头孢西丁耐药。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Apr;23(4):660-2. doi: 10.1093/jac/23.4.660.
10
Comparative susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group species and other anaerobic bacteria to meropenem, imipenem, piperacillin, cefoxitin, ampicillin/sulbactam, clindamycin and metronidazole.脆弱拟杆菌群物种及其他厌氧菌对美罗培南、亚胺培南、哌拉西林、头孢西丁、氨苄西林/舒巴坦、克林霉素和甲硝唑的敏感性比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31(3):363-72. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.3.363.

引用本文的文献

1
Rapid and Profound Shifts in the Vaginal Microbiota Following Antibiotic Treatment for Bacterial Vaginosis.细菌性阴道病抗生素治疗后阴道微生物群的快速而深刻的变化
J Infect Dis. 2015 Sep 1;212(5):793-802. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv079. Epub 2015 Feb 12.