Kahn Jeremy M, Fuchs Barry D
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007 Dec;13(6):709-13. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282f1be5c.
The movement towards greater accountability in medicine has made quality improvement a routine part of daily clinical practice in the intensive care unit. We review recent advances in the field of quality improvement and discuss some of the challenges to successful quality improvement initiatives in critical care.
Regular quality improvement is an essential component of modern critical care medicine; some authors have even suggested an ethical imperative to engage in quality improvement activities. Ideal quality measures are reliable, valid and strongly linked to patient-centered outcomes. In addition to standard quality indicators, clinicians should consider measuring and improving novel targets such as organizational climate, family communication and palliative care. Effective implementation requires a comprehensive environmental scan, multidisciplinary collaboration, and strategies for sustained improvement. Potential pitfalls include emphasizing process measures at the expense of outcome measures and focusing on preventing adverse events at the expense of utilizing efficacious treatments.
Integrating quality measurement and improvement with daily clinical practice is among the most important challenges facing critical care. Following established principles will help ensure that quality improvement initiatives are interpretable, successful, and meaningful to patients and families.
医学领域对更高问责制的追求已使质量改进成为重症监护病房日常临床实践的常规组成部分。我们回顾了质量改进领域的最新进展,并讨论了重症监护中成功开展质量改进举措所面临的一些挑战。
定期进行质量改进是现代重症医学的重要组成部分;一些作者甚至提出参与质量改进活动是一种道德要求。理想的质量指标应可靠、有效且与以患者为中心的结果紧密相关。除了标准质量指标外,临床医生还应考虑衡量和改进诸如组织氛围、医患沟通及姑息治疗等新的指标。有效的实施需要全面的环境审视、多学科协作以及持续改进的策略。潜在的陷阱包括以牺牲结果指标为代价强调过程指标,以及以牺牲有效治疗的应用为代价专注于预防不良事件。
将质量衡量与改进融入日常临床实践是重症监护面临的最重要挑战之一。遵循既定原则将有助于确保质量改进举措对患者及其家属而言是可解释的、成功的且有意义的。