Serna L A, Schumaker J B, Sherman J A, Sheldon J B
University of Hawaii, Honolulu 96822.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Winter;24(4):733-46. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-733.
The effects of a three-phase family communication program were evaluated. In the skill-teaching phase, family members were taught reciprocal social communication skills in a clinic setting. During the skill-review phase, each family member practiced the skills in their homes with the teacher. During the home-based family conference phase, each family was taught to use a structured format to resolve current family issues using their newly acquired skills. In-home parent-youth interactions were observed during a series of 1-hr sessions that involved directed and nondirected situations. Evaluation included a multiple baseline design across skills during the skill-teaching phase and a multiple baseline design across families for the family conference phase. Although the procedures of the skill-teaching phase resulted in parent-adolescent dyads learning to use the skills in the teaching setting, competent use of the skills in the home was not observed until the family conference phase was implemented. These results suggest the importance of home-based intervention if changes are to be obtained at home.
对一个三阶段家庭沟通项目的效果进行了评估。在技能教学阶段,家庭成员在诊所环境中学习相互的社交沟通技能。在技能复习阶段,每个家庭成员在自己家中与教师一起练习这些技能。在家庭会议阶段,每个家庭学习使用一种结构化的形式,运用新获得的技能解决当前的家庭问题。在一系列为期1小时的会议中,观察了有指导和无指导情况下的家庭内部亲子互动。评估包括在技能教学阶段对各项技能的多基线设计,以及在家庭会议阶段对各个家庭的多基线设计。虽然技能教学阶段的程序使亲子二元组在教学环境中学会了使用这些技能,但直到实施家庭会议阶段,才观察到在家庭中能够熟练使用这些技能。这些结果表明,如果要在家里取得改变,家庭干预很重要。