Suppr超能文献

强制或受监督的社区治疗能否减少“反复住院”式的治疗?相关立法与近期证据不一致。

Does compulsory or supervised community treatment reduce 'revolving door' care? Legislation is inconsistent with recent evidence.

作者信息

Kisely Stephen, Campbell Leslie Anne

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Research, Dalhousie University, 5790 University Avenue, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;191:373-4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.035956.

Abstract

Supervised community treatment to address 'revolving door' care is part of the new Mental Health Act in England and Wales. Two recent epidemiological studies in Australia (n>118 000), as well as a systematic review of all previous literature using appropriately matched or randomised controls (n=1108), suggest that it is unlikely to help.

摘要

旨在解决“旋转门”式治疗问题的社区监管治疗是英格兰和威尔士新《精神健康法》的一部分。澳大利亚最近的两项流行病学研究(样本量n>118000)以及一项对所有使用适当匹配或随机对照的既往文献的系统评价(样本量n=1108)表明,这种治疗不太可能有帮助。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验