使用布鲁因inks-奥塞雷茨基运动技能测试来识别有运动障碍的儿童。
Use of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency for identifying children with motor impairment.
作者信息
Venetsanou Fotini, Kambas Antonis, Aggeloussis Nickos, Serbezis Vasilios, Taxildaris Kyriakos
机构信息
Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece.
出版信息
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Nov;49(11):846-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00846.x.
This study compared the consistency of the Short Form (SF) and the Long Form (LF) of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOTMP) in identifying preschool children with motor impairment (MI). One hundred and forty-four Greek preschool children participated (74 males, 70 females; mean age 5 y 2 mo [SD 5 mo], range 4 y 6 mo-5 y 6 mo). Although total SF and LF scores were highly correlated (r=0.85), paired t-tests indicated significant differences (t=-27.466, p=0.001). SF total scores (mean 58.72 [SD 7.28]) were higher than LF total scores (mean 47.38 [SD 9.43]). SF had low sensitivity (13.6%) and negative predictive value (72.5%) for identifying MI. The BOTMP-SF does not appear to be a valid test for the identification of MI in 5-year-old children.
本研究比较了布鲁宁克斯-奥塞瑞斯基运动技能测试（BOTMP）的简式（SF）和长式（LF）在识别有运动障碍（MI）的学龄前儿童方面的一致性。144名希腊学龄前儿童参与了研究（74名男性，70名女性；平均年龄5岁2个月[标准差5个月]，范围4岁6个月至5岁6个月）。虽然SF和LF的总分高度相关（r = 0.85），但配对t检验显示存在显著差异（t = -27.466，p = 0.001）。SF总分（平均58.72[标准差7.28]）高于LF总分（平均47.38[标准差9.43]）。SF在识别MI方面敏感性较低（13.6%）且阴性预测值较低（72.5%）。BOTMP-SF似乎不是识别5岁儿童MI的有效测试。
Zotero 插件