Suppr超能文献

采用可扩张椎间融合器及腹外侧钢板固定技术对胸段及胸腰段脊柱进行微创重建与稳定的技术及临床效果

Technique and clinical results of minimally invasive reconstruction and stabilization of the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine with expandable cages and ventrolateral plate fixation.

作者信息

Scheufler Kai-Michael

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, NeuroCenter Zurich, Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2007 Oct;61(4):798-808; discussion 808-9. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000298909.01754.C5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the techniques of minimally invasive single- and multilevel corpectomy and reconstruction of the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine using expandable vertebral body replacement (VBR) cages and ventrolateral plate fixation (VPF) via anterolateral retropleural (ALRA) and combined thoracoabdominal approaches.

METHODS

38 patients with spondylitis, traumatic or metastatic lesions of thoracic or thoracolumbar vertebrae T4 to L2 underwent spinal decompression and ventral column reconstruction with correction of spinal deformity by VBR and VPF via ALRA or a combined lateral extrapleural/extraperitoneal (extracoelomic) thoracolumbar approach (CLETA). Overall clinical and neurological outcome, operative time, blood loss, reduction of deformity, and postoperative pain were assessed during a mean follow-up period of 22.8 months.

RESULTS

VBR and VPF were carried out successfully without conversion to conventional approaches in all patients. Mean operative time (ALRA, 163 +/- 33 min; CLETA, 175 +/- 39 min), mean blood loss (ALRA, 280 +/- 160 ml; CLETA, 420 +/- 250 ml), average correction (19.3 degrees), loss of correction of sagittal deformity (0.9 degrees), and clinical outcome compare favorably to the results reported for open and endoscopic techniques. Postoperative pain levels (mean visual analog scale score at 24 h, 2.7 +/- 0.9) and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary dysfunction (three out of 38 patients) were low. The average length of stay was 7.4 days. ALRA and CLETA obviate routine chest tube insertion, thus allowing for early postoperative ambulation (average, 1.1 d).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive VBR and VPF conducted via minimally invasive approaches (ALRA or CLETA) yields favorable clinical results at least equal to conventional open surgery, with significant reductions in perioperative morbidity and pain, expedited ambulation, and early discharge from the hospital.

摘要

目的

评估采用可扩张椎体置换(VBR)椎间融合器及腹侧钢板固定(VPF),经胸腹膜后外侧(ALRA)及胸腹联合入路,对胸段及胸腰段脊柱进行微创单节段和多节段椎体切除及重建的技术。

方法

38例患有脊柱炎、胸段或胸腰段T4至L2椎体创伤性或转移性病变的患者,接受了经ALRA或联合外侧胸膜外/腹膜外(腹腔外)胸腰段入路(CLETA),使用VBR和VPF进行脊柱减压及腹侧柱重建并矫正脊柱畸形。在平均22.8个月的随访期内,评估总体临床和神经功能结果、手术时间、失血量、畸形矫正情况及术后疼痛。

结果

所有患者均成功实施VBR和VPF,无需转为传统手术方法。平均手术时间(ALRA为163±33分钟;CLETA为175±39分钟)、平均失血量(ALRA为280±160毫升;CLETA为420±250毫升)、平均矫正度(19.3度)、矢状面畸形矫正丢失(0.9度),与开放手术和内镜技术报道的结果相比具有优势。术后疼痛水平(术后24小时平均视觉模拟评分,2.7±0.9)及术后肺功能障碍发生率(38例患者中有3例)较低。平均住院时间为7.4天。ALRA和CLETA无需常规插入胸管,因此术后可早期活动(平均1.1天)。

结论

通过微创入路(ALRA或CLETA)进行的微创VBR和VPF产生了良好的临床效果,至少与传统开放手术相当,围手术期发病率和疼痛显著降低,活动加快,且可早期出院。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验