Suppr超能文献

乳腺活检边缘的非典型导管增生——是否需要再次切除?

Atypical ductal hyperplasia at margin of breast biopsy--is re-excision indicated?

作者信息

Arora Shalini, Menes Tehillah S, Moung Christine, Nagi Chandandeep, Bleiweiss Ira, Jaffer Shabnam

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Mar;15(3):843-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9681-4. Epub 2007 Nov 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atypical duct hyperplasia (ADH) observed during core needle biopsy is associated with a high rate of cancer upon excision. Controversy exists regarding the need to re-excise ADH involving a margin. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of residual pathology in patients that underwent re-excision for ADH involving the margin.

METHODS

In a retrospective review of the pathology database from 1 January 2000 to 1 June 2006, we identified 44 lumpectomy specimens with ADH involving the margin; 24 patients (55%) had a re-excision. Slides were reviewed to verify the diagnosis of ADH near the margin and the presence of residual disease on re-excision associated with the biopsy cavity.

RESULTS

Patients had pure ADH (15, 63%), ADH and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (7, 29%) or ADH with invasive carcinoma (2, 8%). Residual ADH or cancer was found in 14 of 24 patients (58%). Of 15 patients with pure ADH, 6 (40%) had residual pathology: ADH (2), DCIS (2) and invasive carcinoma (2). In this group, 27% of patients were reassessed as having DCIS or invasive carcinoma. Of the 9 patients with cancer, 8 (89%) had residual disease in the form of ADH (4) or DCIS (4).

CONCLUSIONS

ADH found at the margin of a lumpectomy specimen is associated with a high rate of residual ADH and cancer. Over one quarter of the patients with an initial diagnosis of ADH were reassessed as having DCIS or invasive carcinoma. Re-excision in all patients with ADH involving the margin is recommended.

摘要

背景

在粗针活检过程中观察到的非典型导管增生(ADH)与切除术后的高癌症发生率相关。对于是否需要重新切除累及切缘的ADH存在争议。本研究的目的是确定因累及切缘的ADH而接受再次切除的患者中残留病理的发生率。

方法

在对2000年1月1日至2006年6月1日的病理数据库进行回顾性研究时,我们确定了44例有累及切缘ADH的乳房肿块切除术标本;24例患者(55%)进行了再次切除。对切片进行复查,以核实切缘附近ADH的诊断以及再次切除时与活检腔相关的残留疾病的存在情况。

结果

患者的病理类型为单纯ADH(15例,63%)、ADH合并导管原位癌(DCIS)(7例,29%)或ADH合并浸润性癌(2例,8%)。24例患者中有14例(58%)发现残留ADH或癌症。在15例单纯ADH患者中,6例(40%)有残留病理:ADH(2例)、DCIS(2例)和浸润性癌(2例)。在该组中,27%的患者被重新评估为患有DCIS或浸润性癌。在9例患有癌症的患者中,8例(89%)有ADH(4例)或DCIS(4例)形式的残留疾病。

结论

乳房肿块切除术标本切缘处发现的ADH与高残留ADH和癌症发生率相关。超过四分之一最初诊断为ADH的患者被重新评估为患有DCIS或浸润性癌。建议对所有累及切缘的ADH患者进行再次切除。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验