Suppr超能文献

健康素养对结直肠癌筛查知识、信念和行为的影响。

The influence of health literacy on colorectal cancer screening knowledge, beliefs and behavior.

作者信息

Peterson Neeraja B, Dwyer Kathleen A, Mulvaney Shelagh A, Dietrich Mary S, Rothman Russell L

机构信息

Center for Health Services Research, Division of General Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Med Assoc. 2007 Oct;99(10):1105-12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if health literacy is associated with knowledge of colorectal cancer (CRC) and CRC screening tests, with perceived benefits and barriers to CRC screening, with perceived risk of CRC, with reported self-efficacy for completing CRC screening and with receipt of CRC tests.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 99 subjects completed a health literacy assessment, the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) and a structured interview.

RESULTS

Limited or inadequate health literacy was significantly associated with less knowledge about CRC and CRC screening and with more reported barriers to completing fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and colonoscopy in multivariate analysis. Health literacy was not associated with perceived benefits or reported self-efficacy for completing FOBT or colonoscopy, with perceived risk of developing CRC or with completing CRC tests. However, our small sample size limited our power to detect differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with limited health literacy have less knowledge about CRC and CRC screening and report more barriers to completing FOBT and colonoscopy. Interventions to improve CRC screening should consider the health literacy of patients, especially when addressing barriers to screening. Future studies are needed to better define the role of health literacy in CRC screening.

摘要

目的

确定健康素养是否与结直肠癌(CRC)知识及CRC筛查检测、对CRC筛查的感知益处和障碍、对CRC的感知风险、报告的完成CRC筛查的自我效能以及CRC检测的接受情况相关。

方法

99名受试者的便利样本完成了健康素养评估、成人医学快速识字评估(REALM)和结构化访谈。

结果

在多变量分析中,有限或不足的健康素养与对CRC及CRC筛查的了解较少以及报告的完成粪便潜血检测(FOBT)和结肠镜检查的障碍较多显著相关。健康素养与对完成FOBT或结肠镜检查的感知益处或报告的自我效能、患CRC的感知风险或完成CRC检测无关。然而,我们的小样本量限制了我们检测差异的能力。

结论

健康素养有限的患者对CRC及CRC筛查的了解较少,并且报告的完成FOBT和结肠镜检查的障碍更多。改善CRC筛查的干预措施应考虑患者的健康素养,尤其是在解决筛查障碍时。需要进一步的研究来更好地界定健康素养在CRC筛查中的作用。

相似文献

4
Physician counseling on colorectal cancer screening and receipt of screening among Latino patients.
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Apr;30(4):483-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3126-0.
5
Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a case-control study.
World J Gastroenterol. 2009 May 28;15(20):2531-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2531.
6
The influence of sociocultural factors on colonoscopy and FOBT screening adherence among low-income Hispanics.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 Aug;22(3):925-44. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0074.
7
Association Between Primary Care Visits and Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes in the Era of Population Health Outreach.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct;31(10):1190-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3760-9. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
8
Literacy barriers to colorectal cancer screening in community clinics.
J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3(0 3):252-64. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.713441.
9
Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug;80(2):284-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.034. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
10
Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Feb;23(2):169-74. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0480-1. Epub 2007 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring cancer knowledge and sources of information among the public: An analytical study.
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2025 Jul 7;17(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4820.
4
Health literacy and all-cause mortality among cancer patients.
Cancer. 2025 Mar 15;131(6):e35794. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35794.
5
Interventions Addressing Health Literacy in Cancer Care: A Systematic Review of Reviews.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 2;22(2):212. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020212.
6
Trends in palliative care utilization among older adult decedents with and without cancer in Taiwan: a population-based comparative study.
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Jan 28;55:101479. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101479. eCollection 2025 Feb.
9
A Double-Edged Sword: Quality and Credibility of Colon Cancer Screening Content on YouTube.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 26;16(2):e54929. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54929. eCollection 2024 Feb.
10
Knowledge and Attitudes toward Colorectal Cancer among Healthcare Workers: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Survey in Thailand.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Jan 1;25(1):153-158. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.1.153.

本文引用的文献

2
Health literacy as a predictor of follow-up after an abnormal Pap smear: a prospective study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Aug;21(8):829-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00534.x.
3
4
Increased use of colorectal cancer tests--United States, 2002 and 2004.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006 Mar 24;55(11):308-11.
5
Colorectal cancer test use among Hispanic and non-Hispanic U.S. populations.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A50. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
6
American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2006.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2006 Jan-Feb;56(1):11-25; quiz 49-50. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.56.1.11.
7
8
Weakness in numbers. The challenge of numeracy in health care.
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Nov;20(11):1071-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.051498.x.
9
Literacy and knowledge, attitudes, and behavior about colorectal cancer screening.
J Health Commun. 2005 Oct-Nov;10(7):651-63. doi: 10.1080/10810730500267720.
10
A definition and operational framework for health numeracy.
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Nov;29(4):375-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.06.012.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验