Nápoles Anna M, Santoyo-Olsson Jasmine, Stewart Anita L, Olmstead Jill, Gregorich Steven E, Farren Georgianna, Cabral Ruben, Freudman Andrew, Pérez-Stable Eliseo J
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, and Medical Effectiveness Research Center for Diverse Populations, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 3333 California Street, Suite 335, San Francisco, CA, 94118-0856, USA,
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Apr;30(4):483-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3126-0.
Latinos have lower rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and later stage diagnosis than Whites, which may be partially explained by physician communication factors.
We assessed associations between patient-reported physician counseling regarding CRC screening and receipt of CRC screening among Latino primary care patients.
This was a cross-sectional telephone survey.
The participants of this study were Latino primary care patients 50 years of age or older, with one or more visits during the preceding year.
We developed patient-reported measures to assess whether physicians provided explanations of CRC risks and tests, elicited patients' barriers to CRC screening, were responsive to patients' concerns about screening, and encouraged patients to be screened. Outcomes were patient reports of receipt of endoscopy (sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy) and fecal occult blood test (FOBT) within recommended guidelines.
Of 817 eligible patients contacted, 505 (62 %) completed the survey; mean age was 61 years (SD 8.4), 69 % were women, and 53 % had less than high school education. Forty-six percent reported obtaining endoscopy (with or without FOBT), 13 % reported FOBT only, and 41 % reported no CRC screening. In bivariate analyses, physician explanations, elicitation of barriers, responsiveness to concerns, and greater encouragement for screening were associated with receipt of endoscopy (p < 0.001), and explanations (p < 0.05) and encouragement (p < 0.001) were associated with FOBT. Adjusting for covariates, physician explanations (OR = 1.27; 95 % CI 1.03, 1.58) and greater physician encouragement (OR = 6.74; 95 % CI 3.57, 12.72) were associated with endoscopy; patients reporting quite a bit/a lot of physician encouragement had six times higher odds of obtaining the FOBT as those reporting none/a little encouragement (OR = 6.54; 95 % CI 2.76, 15.48).
Among primarily lower-socioeconomic status Latino patients, the degree to which patients perceived that physicians encouraged CRC screening was more strongly associated with screening than with providing risk information, eliciting barriers, and responding to their concerns about screening.
拉丁裔人群的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查率和晚期诊断率低于白人,这可能部分归因于医生沟通因素。
我们评估了拉丁裔初级保健患者中,患者报告的医生关于CRC筛查的咨询与接受CRC筛查之间的关联。
这是一项横断面电话调查。
本研究的参与者为50岁及以上的拉丁裔初级保健患者,他们在前一年有过一次或多次就诊。
我们开发了患者报告的测量指标,以评估医生是否对CRC风险和检查进行了解释,是否引出了患者进行CRC筛查的障碍,是否回应了患者对筛查的担忧,以及是否鼓励患者进行筛查。结果是患者报告在推荐指南范围内接受了内镜检查(乙状结肠镜检查或结肠镜检查)和粪便潜血试验(FOBT)。
在联系的817名符合条件的患者中,505名(62%)完成了调查;平均年龄为61岁(标准差8.4),69%为女性,53%的教育程度低于高中。46%的患者报告进行了内镜检查(无论是否进行FOBT),13%的患者仅报告进行了FOBT,41%的患者报告未进行CRC筛查。在双变量分析中,医生的解释、对障碍的引出、对担忧的回应以及对筛查的更多鼓励与接受内镜检查相关(p<0.001),解释(p<0.05)和鼓励(p<0.001)与FOBT相关。在对协变量进行调整后,医生的解释(比值比[OR]=1.27;95%置信区间[CI]1.03,1.58)和医生更多的鼓励(OR=6.74;95%CI 3.57,12.72)与内镜检查相关;报告医生给予相当多/很多鼓励的患者进行FOBT的几率是报告没有/很少鼓励的患者的6倍(OR=6.54;95%CI 2.76,15.48)。
在主要为社会经济地位较低的拉丁裔患者中,患者认为医生鼓励CRC筛查的程度与筛查的关联,比提供风险信息、引出障碍以及回应他们对筛查的担忧更为紧密。