Scheingraber Stefan, Richter Sven, Igna Dorian, Girndt Matthias, Flesch Sarah, Kleinschmidt Stefan, Schilling Martin K
Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital, University of the Saarland, Homburg, Germany.
Clin Transplant. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(6):689-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00706.x.
Measurement of indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (PDR(ICG)) has been suggested as a meaningful liver function parameter. However, there are only very limited data concerning its value in the monitoring of graft dysfunction (GDF) and primary non-function (PNF) especially during molecular absorbent recirculating system (MARS) therapy. This study was therefore performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy to detect and monitor GDF with the measurement of the PDR(ICG) in direct comparison with conventional markers like bilirubin and prothrombin time (PT). Of the 19 liver recipients, four patients with GDF and two patients with PNF were treated with 38 MARS cycles. Only PDR(ICG) did reliably indicate liver function between patients with GDF/PNF and patients with sufficient graft function who served as controls. Moreover, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed the highest areas under the curve (AUC) for PDR(ICG) (AUC(PDRICG max): 0.840, AUC(PDRICG max): 0.822), followed by bilirubin (AUC(bilirubin): 0.528) and PT (AUC(PT): 0.546). In contrast to the decrease of the serum bilirubin concentration due to MARS, a noticeable improvement of PDR(ICG) was evident only in patients with GDF. Patients with acute fulminant failure and PNF had significantly lower PDR(ICG) values, which did not improve even during continuous MARS treatments. Conclusively, monitoring of PDR(ICG) is superior to bilirubin and PT measurements to determine the graft function especially in patients with PNF and GDF undergoing MARS therapy.
吲哚菁绿血浆消失率(PDR(ICG))的测量已被认为是一项有意义的肝功能参数。然而,关于其在监测移植肝功能障碍(GDF)和原发性无功能(PNF)方面的价值,尤其是在分子吸附再循环系统(MARS)治疗期间的数据非常有限。因此,本研究旨在通过测量PDR(ICG)来评估检测和监测GDF的诊断准确性,并与胆红素和凝血酶原时间(PT)等传统标志物进行直接比较。在19例肝移植受者中,4例GDF患者和2例PNF患者接受了38个MARS治疗周期。只有PDR(ICG)能够可靠地显示GDF/PNF患者与作为对照的移植肝功能良好患者之间的肝功能情况。此外,受试者工作特征分析显示PDR(ICG)的曲线下面积(AUC)最高(AUC(PDRICG max):0.840,AUC(PDRICG max):0.822),其次是胆红素(AUC(胆红素):0.528)和PT(AUC(PT):0.546)。与MARS治疗导致血清胆红素浓度降低不同,只有GDF患者的PDR(ICG)有明显改善。急性暴发性肝衰竭和PNF患者的PDR(ICG)值显著较低,即使在持续MARS治疗期间也没有改善。总之,监测PDR(ICG)在确定移植肝功能方面优于胆红素和PT测量,尤其是对于接受MARS治疗的PNF和GDF患者。