Jipson Jennifer L, Gelman Susan A
Department of Psychology and Child Development, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA.
Child Dev. 2007 Nov-Dec;78(6):1675-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01095.x.
This study tests the firm distinction children are said to make between living and nonliving kinds. Three, 4-, and 5-year-old children and adults reasoned about whether items that varied on 3 dimensions (alive, face, behavior) had a range of properties (biological, psychological, perceptual, artifact, novel, proper names). Findings demonstrate that by 4 years of age, children make clear distinctions between prototypical living and nonliving kinds regardless of the property under consideration. Even 3-year-olds distinguish prototypical living and nonliving kinds when asked about biological properties. When reasoning about nonbiological properties for the full range of items, however, even 5-year-olds and adults occasionally rely on facial features. Thus, the living/nonliving distinction may have more narrow consequences than previously acknowledged.
本研究检验了儿童据称在生物与非生物类别之间做出的明确区分。研究让三组4岁、5岁儿童以及成年人思考在三个维度(有生命、有面孔、有行为)上存在差异的物品是否具有一系列属性(生物的、心理的、感知的、人造的、新奇的、专有名称)。研究结果表明,到4岁时,无论考虑何种属性,儿童都能在典型的生物和非生物类别之间做出明确区分。即使是3岁儿童,在被问及生物属性时,也能区分典型的生物和非生物类别。然而,当对所有物品的非生物属性进行推理时,即使是5岁儿童和成年人也偶尔会依赖面部特征。因此,生物/非生物的区分可能比之前所认为的具有更有限的影响。