Suppr超能文献

托吡酯6个月偏头痛预防性治疗的停药与继续治疗(PROMPT):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验

Cessation versus continuation of 6-month migraine preventive therapy with topiramate (PROMPT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

作者信息

Diener Hans-Christoph, Agosti Reto, Allais Gianni, Bergmans Paul, Bussone Gennaro, Davies Brendan, Ertas Mustafa, Lanteri-Minet Michel, Reuter Uwe, Sánchez Del Río Margarita, Schoenen Jean, Schwalen Susanne, van Oene Joop

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Lancet Neurol. 2007 Dec;6(12):1054-62. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70272-7. Epub 2007 Nov 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of preventive therapy for migraine is often recommended for only 6-9 months, but no randomised, placebo-controlled trials have investigated migraine frequency after the end of prophylaxis. We assessed the effects of discontinuation of topiramate after a treatment period of 6 months.

METHODS

818 patients who have migraines were enrolled from 88 clinics in 21 countries. After a 4-8-week lead-in period, patients received topiramate in a 26-week open-label phase. Daily dose was increased from 25 mg to 100 mg in steps of 25 mg every week; the dose could be adjusted further in the range 50-200 mg/day, but was stable for the final 4 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to continue this dose or switch to placebo for a 26-week double-blind phase. The primary endpoint was the difference in number of days with migraine during the last 4 weeks of the double-blind phase compared with the last 4 weeks of the open-label phase. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2005-000321-29.

FINDINGS

559 patients (68.3%) completed the open-label phase; 514 entered the double-blind phase and were assigned to topiramate (n=255) or placebo (n=259). The mean increase in number of migraine days was greater in the placebo group (1.19 days in 4 weeks, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.66; p<0.0001) than in the topiramate group (0.10, -0.36 to 0.56; p=0.5756; mean difference between groups -1.09, -1.75 to -0.43; p=0.0011) [corrected] Patients in the placebo group had a greater number of days on acute medication than did those in the topiramate group (mean difference between groups -0.95, -1.49 to -0.41; p=0.0007). Quality of life, as assessed by the MIDAS questionnaire, fell in the placebo group but remained stable in the topiramate group. Patients were more satisfied with the efficacy of topiramate than with that of placebo, whereas satisfaction with tolerability was similar in both treatment groups.

INTERPRETATION

Sustained benefit was reported after discontinuation of topiramate, although number of migraine days did increase. These findings suggest that patients should be treated for 6 months, with the option to continue to 12 months in some patients.

摘要

背景

偏头痛预防性治疗通常建议仅进行6 - 9个月,但尚无随机、安慰剂对照试验研究预防结束后偏头痛的发作频率。我们评估了6个月治疗期后停用托吡酯的效果。

方法

从21个国家的88家诊所招募了818例偏头痛患者。在为期4 - 8周的导入期后,患者在26周的开放标签阶段接受托吡酯治疗。每日剂量从25毫克每周递增25毫克至100毫克;剂量可在50 - 200毫克/天的范围内进一步调整,但在最后4周保持稳定。患者被随机分配继续该剂量或在26周的双盲阶段改用安慰剂。主要终点是双盲阶段最后4周与开放标签阶段最后4周偏头痛天数的差异。分析采用意向性治疗。该试验已在欧洲临床试验数据库(EudraCT)注册,编号为2005 - 000321 - 29。

结果

559例患者(68.3%)完成了开放标签阶段;514例进入双盲阶段,被分配至托吡酯组(n = 255)或安慰剂组(n = 259)。安慰剂组偏头痛天数的平均增加幅度大于托吡酯组(4周内增加1.19天,95%置信区间0.71至1.66;p < 0.0001),而托吡酯组为0.10天(-0.36至0.56;p = 0.5756;组间平均差异 -1.09,-1.75至 -0.43;p = 0.0011)[校正后]。安慰剂组使用急性药物的天数多于托吡酯组(组间平均差异 -0.95,-1.49至 -0.41;p = 0.0007)。根据偏头痛残疾评定量表(MIDAS)问卷评估,安慰剂组的生活质量下降,而托吡酯组保持稳定。患者对托吡酯疗效的满意度高于安慰剂,而两组对耐受性的满意度相似。

解读

尽管偏头痛天数确实增加,但停用托吡酯后仍有持续益处。这些发现表明患者应接受6个月的治疗,部分患者可选择继续治疗至12个月。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验