Fuentes Luis J, Campoy Guillermo
Departamento de Psicología Básica y Metodología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;185(4):667-72. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1193-8. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
In the present experiment we used a version of the attention network test (ANT) similar to that of Callejas et al. (Exp Brain Res 167:27-37, 2005) to assess the Posner's attention networks (alerting, orienting and conflict), and their interactions. We observed shorter reaction times with alerting tone than with no alerting tone trials (the alerting effect); with cued than with uncued trials (the orienting effect); and with congruent than with incongruent trials (the conflict effect). These results replicate previous findings with the ANT. We also manipulated cue-target interval at five stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) values (100, 300, 500, 800, and 1,200 ms) to trace the alerting network influence over the orienting network. The SOA manipulation showed that cuing effects peaked at 300 ms SOA irrespective of whether an alerting tone was present or not, and the alerting tone improved the cuing effect equally for 100-500 SOAs, but it did not at the longest 800-1,200 ms SOAs. These results suggest that alerting improves rather than accelerates orienting effects, a result that agrees with data from neuropsychological rehabilitation of parietal patients with spatial bias.
在本实验中,我们使用了一种类似于Callejas等人(《实验脑研究》167:27 - 37,2005年)所采用的注意力网络测试(ANT)版本,以评估波斯纳的注意力网络(警觉、定向和冲突)及其相互作用。我们观察到,与无警觉音试验相比,有警觉音试验的反应时间更短(警觉效应);与无提示试验相比,有提示试验的反应时间更短(定向效应);与不一致试验相比,一致试验的反应时间更短(冲突效应)。这些结果重复了先前使用ANT所得到的发现。我们还在五个刺激起始异步(SOA)值(100、300、500、800和1200毫秒)下操纵提示 - 目标间隔,以追踪警觉网络对定向网络的影响。SOA操纵表明,无论是否存在警觉音,提示效应在300毫秒SOA时达到峰值,并且警觉音在100 - 500毫秒的SOA下对提示效应的改善程度相同,但在最长的800 - 1200毫秒SOA时则不然。这些结果表明,警觉改善而非加速定向效应,这一结果与患有空间偏差的顶叶患者神经心理康复的数据一致。