Suppr超能文献

蛋白质构象的圆二色性分析中的一些问题。

Some problems of CD analyses of protein conformation.

作者信息

Baikalov I A, Wu C S, Yang J T

机构信息

Institute of Protein Research, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Puschino, Moscow Region.

出版信息

Anal Biochem. 1991 Nov 1;198(2):250-5. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(91)90421-o.

Abstract

The circular dichroic (CD) spectra of 16 reference proteins were analyzed by the Provencher-Glöckner method (Biochemistry 20, 31, 1981) with the lower-wavelength limit raised from 190 to 235 nm at 5-nm intervals. Fifty-one data points at 1-nm intervals were taken between 190 and 240 nm. Variations of the correlation coefficients (r) and root-mean-square (RMS) deviations between X-ray diffraction results and CD analyses showed no definite trend with shorter wavelength ranges. The CD spectra (190-240 nm) were also analyzed by assigning the secondary structure of X-ray results according to the Levitt-Greer method (J. Mol. Biol. 114, 181, 1977) and the Kabsch-Sander method (Biopolymers 22, 2577, 1983). The r and RMS values based on the Levitt-Greer assignment were good and comparable to those based on the secondary structure given by crystallographers, but the Kabsch-Sander assignment seemed to give unsatisfactory results. The choice of reference proteins remains one of the uncertainties in the CD analysis. The five most significant orthogonal spectra (190-240 nm) calculated from the 16 reference proteins and those based on another 16 proteins used by Hennessey and Johnson (Biochemistry 20, 1085, 1981) were similar to each other, but different in intensities. These methods still cannot recognize a failed analysis of unknown proteins without X-ray results to check their reliability.

摘要

采用Provencher-Glöckner方法(《生物化学》20, 31, 1981)分析了16种参考蛋白质的圆二色(CD)光谱,将较低波长极限从190 nm提高到235 nm,间隔为5 nm。在190至240 nm之间以1 nm间隔获取了51个数据点。X射线衍射结果与CD分析之间的相关系数(r)和均方根(RMS)偏差的变化在较短波长范围内没有明确趋势。还根据Levitt-Greer方法(《分子生物学杂志》114, 181, 1977)和Kabsch-Sander方法(《生物聚合物》22, 2577, 1983)对X射线结果的二级结构进行赋值,分析了CD光谱(190 - 240 nm)。基于Levitt-Greer赋值的r和RMS值良好,与晶体学家给出的二级结构相当,但Kabsch-Sander赋值似乎给出了不令人满意的结果。参考蛋白质的选择仍然是CD分析中的不确定因素之一。从16种参考蛋白质计算出的五个最显著的正交光谱(190 - 240 nm)以及基于Hennessey和Johnson(《生物化学》20, 1085, 1981)使用的另外16种蛋白质计算出的光谱彼此相似,但强度不同。在没有X射线结果来检验其可靠性的情况下,这些方法仍然无法识别对未知蛋白质的分析失败情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验