Clark W Randy, Clark Leigh Anne
Management and Marketing Department, Jennings A. Jones College of Business, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37129, USA.
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2007 Oct-Dec;26(4):306-17. doi: 10.1097/01.HCM.0000299248.53441.e9.
Although there is a growing concern about health care quality, little research has focused on how to measure quality in long-term care settings. In this article, we make the following observations: (1) most users of the SERVQUAL instrument reassess customers' expectations each time they measure quality perceptions; (2) long-term care relationships are likely to be ongoing, dependent relationships; (3) because of this dependence, customers in the long-term care setting are likely to reduce their expectations when faced with poor service quality; (4) by using this "settled" expectations level, service providers may make biased conclusions of quality improvements. We recommend various methods for overcoming or minimizing this "settling" effect and propose modifications to the SERVQUAL gap 5 measure to assess quality in a long-term care setting.
尽管人们对医疗保健质量的关注度日益提高,但很少有研究关注如何衡量长期护理机构中的质量。在本文中,我们提出以下观点:(1) SERVQUAL 工具的大多数使用者每次衡量质量感知时都会重新评估客户的期望;(2)长期护理关系可能是持续的依赖关系;(3)由于这种依赖性,长期护理机构中的客户在面对服务质量差时可能会降低期望;(4)通过使用这种“既定”的期望水平,服务提供者可能会对质量改进得出有偏差的结论。我们推荐了各种克服或最小化这种“既定”效应的方法,并提议对 SERVQUAL 差距 5 测量法进行修改,以评估长期护理机构中的质量。