Santodomingo-Rubido Jacinto, Wolffsohn James S, Gilmartin Bernard
School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Eye Contact Lens. 2007 Nov;33(6 Pt 1):288-92. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318030c9b1.
To report differences in the incidence of adverse events and discontinuations found in a group of neophyte contact wearers using two different silicone hydrogel contact lenses on a daily- and continuous-wear basis during an 18-month period.
Sixty-one subjects were initially examined, and 53 were eligible to participate in the study. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned to wear one of two silicone hydrogel materials: lotrafilcon A or balafilcon A lenses on a daily- or continuous-wear basis. After an initial screening, subjects were monitored weekly for the first month and then after 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. The incidence of adverse events, including corneal infiltrative events, superior epithelial arcuate lesions, and contact lens-induced papillary conjunctivitis, and discontinuations in each of the four contact lens groups were recorded.
Twenty-two adverse events were found. A higher incidence of adverse events was found in subjects wearing lotrafilcon A lenses than in those wearing balafilcon A lenses (chi(2) = 4.40, P=0.04). There were fewer adverse events in subjects wearing lenses on a daily-wear basis than in those wearing lenses on a continuous-wear basis (chi(2) = 5.98, P=0.01). Eight subjects discontinued from the study as a result of recurrent corneal infiltrative events (one), vision problems (two), excessive ocular discomfort (one), relocation (one), noncompliance with the study protocol (one), and being lost to follow-up (two). No significant differences were found in the number of discontinuations between the two lens types (chi(2) = 0.66, P=0.42) and wearing regimens (chi(2) = 0.08, P=0.78).
Lotrafilcon A lenses were associated with a higher incidence of adverse events than balafilcon A lenses were, and this difference is attributed to the difference in the incidence of corneal infiltrative events. Subjects wearing lenses on a daily-wear basis had fewer adverse events than did subjects wearing lenses on a continuous-wear basis. Both lens types and wearing regimens showed a similar incidence of discontinuations.
报告在18个月期间,一组初次佩戴隐形眼镜者每日佩戴和连续佩戴两种不同硅水凝胶隐形眼镜时不良事件和停戴情况的发生率差异。
最初检查了61名受试者,其中53名符合参与研究的条件。符合条件的受试者被随机分配佩戴两种硅水凝胶材料之一:lotrafilcon A或balafilcon A镜片,采用每日佩戴或连续佩戴方式。初始筛查后,受试者在第一个月每周接受监测,然后在3、6、12和18个月后再次监测。记录不良事件的发生率,包括角膜浸润事件、上皮性弓形病变和隐形眼镜相关性乳头性结膜炎,以及四个隐形眼镜组中每组的停戴情况。
共发现22起不良事件。佩戴lotrafilcon A镜片的受试者不良事件发生率高于佩戴balafilcon A镜片的受试者(卡方检验=4.40,P=0.04)。每日佩戴镜片的受试者不良事件少于连续佩戴镜片的受试者(卡方检验=5.98,P=0.01)。8名受试者因复发性角膜浸润事件(1例)、视力问题(2例)、眼部不适过度(1例)、搬迁(1例)、未遵守研究方案(1例)和失访(2例)而退出研究。两种镜片类型之间的停戴数量(卡方检验=0.66,P=0.