Min Woo-Kie, Kim Shin-Yoon, Kim Tae-Kong, Lee Kyu-Bong, Cho Myung-Rae, Ha Yong-Chan, Koo Kyung-Hoi
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
J Trauma. 2007 Nov;63(5):1054-60. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000240455.06842.a0.
The reverse obliquity fracture of the proximal femur (AO/OTA 31-A3) is mechanically different from most intertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of proximal femoral nail (PFN) fixation with those of gamma nail (GN) fixation for these fractures.
Between 1993 and 2003, 635 of the fractures were classified as intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric. Clinical and radiographic records were retrospectively reviewed, and 22 fractures with reverse obliquity pattern were identified. The patients were divided into two treatment groups and were followed up for a minimum of 1 year (range, 12-67 months). Eleven patients in group I were treated with the PFN, and 11 patients in group II were treated with the GN. The two groups were comparable with regard to demographic and injury variables. The duration of follow-up averaged 18 months (range, 12-67 months). Radiographic changes during the follow-up, clinical outcome, and complications of the PFN group were compared with those of the GN group.
Reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures accounted for 4.3% of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. Bone union time averaged 16.5 weeks in the PFN group and 17.9 weeks in the GN group. Average sliding of lag screw was 2.5 mm in the PFN group and 3.1 mm in the GN group (p = 0.046). Change of the neck-shaft angle was 2.45 degrees in the PFN group and 3.75 degrees in the GN group (p = 0.032). A satisfactory functional outcome was found in eight patients in the PFN group and also in eight patients in the GN group. There was one osteonecrosis of femoral head in the PFN group. There was one cutting out of lag screw, one nonunion, and one varus deformity in the GN group.
There was no difference in clinical outcome between the PFN and GN groups. However, the PFN demonstrated better results biomechanically than the GN did in terms of less sliding of lag screw, less change of neck-shaft angle, and less complications for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures.
股骨近端反向斜形骨折(AO/OTA 31 - A3)在力学上与大多数转子间骨折不同。本研究的目的是比较股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)固定与伽马钉(GN)固定治疗这些骨折的效果。
1993年至2003年间,635例骨折被分类为转子间或转子下骨折。对临床和影像学记录进行回顾性分析,确定22例反向斜形骨折患者。将患者分为两个治疗组,随访至少1年(范围12 - 67个月)。第一组11例患者采用PFN治疗,第二组11例患者采用GN治疗。两组在人口统计学和损伤变量方面具有可比性。随访时间平均为18个月(范围12 - 67个月)。比较PFN组和GN组随访期间的影像学变化、临床结果及并发症。
反向斜形转子间骨折占转子间和转子下骨折的4.3%。PFN组骨愈合时间平均为16.5周,GN组为17.9周。PFN组拉力螺钉平均滑动2.5 mm,GN组为3.1 mm(p = 0.046)。PFN组颈干角变化为2.45°,GN组为3.75°(p = 0.032)。PFN组8例患者和GN组8例患者功能结果满意。PFN组有1例股骨头坏死。GN组有1例拉力螺钉穿出、1例骨不连和1例内翻畸形。
PFN组和GN组临床结果无差异。然而,在治疗反向斜形转子间骨折方面,PFN在生物力学方面表现更好,拉力螺钉滑动更少、颈干角变化更小且并发症更少。